10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Dignity</strong>: the Council’s Vision | 257<br />

discussion—who are the great <strong>and</strong> who the ordinary human beings—<br />

may be far less obvious.<br />

As it becomes less obvious, as the “comparative” sense of dignity<br />

begins to be transformed by the “non-comparative,” as we are less<br />

sure what is the “floor” <strong>and</strong> what the “height” of human worth, we<br />

may incline to draw back a bit from some elements in the Council’s<br />

discussion. For example, imagining a woman who was once a “virtuoso<br />

violinist” <strong>and</strong> is now suffering from dementia, her “treasured<br />

capacities” largely gone, the Council first affirms that she “remains<br />

a full member of the human community, equally worthy of human<br />

care.” But it then expresses puzzlement about what her dignity might<br />

mean when those capacities are “fading or gone.” In the case of such<br />

a virtuoso—the suggestion seems to be—dementia is especially degrading.<br />

“For all people—<strong>and</strong> perhaps most vividly for those who<br />

once stood high above the ordinary—the regression to dementia <strong>and</strong><br />

incompetence, with all its accompanying indignities <strong>and</strong> loss of selfcomm<strong>and</strong>,<br />

may seem dehumanizing <strong>and</strong> humiliating” (107).<br />

This does not seem true to me. Moreover, I think there is something<br />

objectionable about this way of putting the matter. I cannot<br />

see why dementia afflicting this “virtuoso violinist” should be any<br />

more vividly dehumanizing than it would be were it to afflict, say,<br />

the woman who regularly empties the trash can in my office. Still<br />

more, I would be reluctant to call dementia in either case dehumanizing.<br />

I know of course that one might sometimes incline to the view<br />

that dementia in the case of the violinist was somehow worse than<br />

dementia in the case of the janitor, <strong>and</strong> there might be occasions<br />

when I could be inclined to suppose that dementia in either case was<br />

dehumanizing, but I would regard such inclinations as temptations<br />

(to be resisted as best I could).<br />

It is when I ask myself why these inclinations should be regarded<br />

as temptations that the puzzles arise. I am reluctant to say that any<br />

living human being, even one severely disabled by dementia, has lost<br />

human dignity. Why? I am reluctant to say that some human beings—those<br />

with certain highly developed capacities—have greater<br />

dignity than others. Why?<br />

These two puzzles are interrelated. If we assert that every human<br />

being has dignity, someone is certain to ask from us an account of<br />

what it is about human beings that gives them this equal dignity. And

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!