10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Commentary on Meilaender <strong>and</strong> Dennett | 279<br />

extreme defenses of dignity. Each man portrays himself, with good<br />

reason, as a nice-guy extremist.<br />

And their extreme positions are far from completely incompatible.<br />

Meilaender <strong>and</strong> Dennett agree, for example, that dignity is not a<br />

useless concept. They also agree that dignity has to be saved from the<br />

inhuman reductionism of modern science, or at least from pervasive<br />

misunderst<strong>and</strong>ings of what modern science actually teaches. They<br />

even seem to agree that our underst<strong>and</strong>ing of dignity—or at least<br />

the inherited underst<strong>and</strong>ing of dignity that has distinguished <strong>and</strong><br />

ennobled our tradition—is Christian.<br />

Meilaender claims that we are right to believe in the dignity of<br />

each unique <strong>and</strong> irreplaceable human person <strong>and</strong> the only sensible<br />

explanation for our faith in that observed phenomenon is the Christian<br />

one; we were all given infinite significance by a personal Creator.<br />

Our belief in the equal dignity of all human beings is an indispensable<br />

part of our Christian inheritance. And our attempts to find a<br />

foundation for that belief without Christianity become increasingly<br />

shrill as they become more obviously futile.<br />

Dennett agrees, with scientific condescension, that all our claims<br />

for the reality of human dignity have been Christian. He adds that<br />

all the Christian claims about the soul or some immaterial dimension<br />

of personal existence have been refuted by modern science. For Dennett,<br />

the belief in the soul or in dignity has the same status as belief in<br />

mermaids. It’s no more silly to believe in some half-woman/half-fish<br />

that nobody has ever really seen than it is to believe in a half-soul/<br />

half-body that nobody has ever really seen. Everything that we do,<br />

we now know, has a material explanation. In the spirit of Dennett’s<br />

analysis, we might add two observations: Not so long ago, very smart<br />

<strong>and</strong> astute people believed in souls, while mermaid-believers have<br />

always been rather silly. And in the near future, biotechnology might<br />

allow us to combine the materials of a woman <strong>and</strong> a fish to create<br />

something like a mermaid. But we never will be able to create a soul,<br />

to free ourselves from our essentially material being.<br />

Dennett does claim to see with his own eyes—<strong>and</strong> this is very<br />

important—that our need to believe in equal, personal dignity is<br />

real. It is an observable characteristic of the type of being human beings<br />

alone are. We are the social animals who conceive of projects to<br />

live good, purposeful lives, although there is no scientific foundation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!