10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

76 | Robert P. Kraynak<br />

from God—a comparative rank entitling man to limited dominion<br />

over creatures that is a mirror of God’s total dominion over all<br />

creation. Yet, the divine image can be partially lost, either by the<br />

whole human species, as in the Fall, or by individuals, as a result of<br />

committing murder. In addition to stressing dominion, the passages<br />

from Genesis emphasize procreation, as if procreation were an image<br />

of God’s power of creation—which would explain the reference to<br />

male-female sexual differentiation as part of the divine image <strong>and</strong><br />

the comm<strong>and</strong> to “be fruitful <strong>and</strong> multiply.” Although procreation<br />

enables people to make children in their image—just as God made<br />

Adam in God’s image, so Adam makes Seth in his image—one cannot<br />

be sure if this is the basis of human dignity. For the lower animals<br />

also procreate “according to their kinds” <strong>and</strong> are comm<strong>and</strong>ed to<br />

“be fruitful <strong>and</strong> multiply” (Genesis 1:22). Perhaps the Bible is saying<br />

that procreation with the conscious intention of passing on personal<br />

identity <strong>and</strong> subduing the earth is the divine image in man.<br />

The challenge of Genesis is that it offers a glimpse into human<br />

dignity by referring to the divine image without precisely defining<br />

it. <strong>Dignity</strong> includes man’s superior rank in the created hierarchy; <strong>and</strong><br />

it confers special worth to human life <strong>and</strong> procreation, although the<br />

lifeblood <strong>and</strong> procreation of other animals also receive certain blessings<br />

(as if they too shared in the divine image to some extent). If this<br />

is true, however, what remains of the special dignity of man? The<br />

only answer that makes sense to me is that the lifeblood <strong>and</strong> procreation<br />

which man shares with other animals have a deeper meaning<br />

for the human species: they are pale reflections of something man<br />

alone possessed before the Fall, namely, immortal life. The implication<br />

is that immortality is the lost image of God in man—a suggestion<br />

supported by the account of the Fall, which is primarily about<br />

the loss of immortality, as well as by the longevity of Adam <strong>and</strong> the<br />

early patriarchs, who lived up to 900 years, as a kind of afterglow of<br />

immortality that God finally ended by setting a limit to human life<br />

at 120 years (Genesis 6:3). As compensation for the limited life span<br />

of mortals, the surrogate immortality that Adam gained through his<br />

son Seth continues through the procreation of families <strong>and</strong> tribes<br />

that endure for generations. Man’s dignity, in the sense of original<br />

immortality or surrogate immortality (through children <strong>and</strong> long<br />

life) is therefore a comparative notion since it is the highest degree of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!