10.05.2015 Views

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

Human Dignity and Bioethics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

466 | Paul Weithman<br />

Notes<br />

1<br />

I am grateful to Elizabeth Anderson <strong>and</strong> Robert Audi for helpful comments on<br />

an earlier draft.<br />

2<br />

See www.un.org/Overview/rights.html.<br />

3<br />

The Charter is available via a link at www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/default_<br />

en.htm.<br />

4<br />

Emphasis added; for an English translation of the Basic Law, see www.iuscomp.<br />

org/gla/statutes/GG.htm.<br />

5<br />

Ruth Macklin, “<strong>Dignity</strong> is a Useless Concept,” British Medical Journal 327<br />

(2003): 1419-1420.<br />

6<br />

See, for example, Louis Dupré <strong>and</strong> William O’Neill, SJ, “Social Structures <strong>and</strong><br />

Structural Ethics,” The Review of Politics 51 (1989): 327-344, especially pp. 336<br />

<strong>and</strong> 342.<br />

7<br />

See Jacques Maritain, The Person <strong>and</strong> the Common Good (Notre Dame, Indiana:<br />

University of Notre Dame Press, 1966), trans. John J. Fitzgerald, p. 13: “Our desire<br />

is to make clear the personalism rooted in the doctrine of St. Thomas <strong>and</strong> to<br />

separate, at the very outset, a social philosophy centered in the dignity of the human<br />

person from every social philosophy centered in the primacy of the individual<br />

<strong>and</strong> the private good.”<br />

8<br />

This paragraph summarizes a line of criticism pursued in detail in Martha Nussbaum,<br />

Frontiers of Justice (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press,<br />

2006).<br />

9<br />

The President’s Council on <strong>Bioethics</strong>, <strong>Human</strong> Cloning <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Dignity</strong>: An<br />

Ethical Inquiry (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2002), p. 89;<br />

Taking Care: Ethical Caregiving in Our Aging Society (Washington, D.C.: Government<br />

Printing Office, 2005), p. 104.<br />

10<br />

See Taking Care, pp. 103, 126, 127, 129.<br />

11<br />

The President’s Council on <strong>Bioethics</strong>, Being <strong>Human</strong>: Readings from the President’s<br />

Council on <strong>Bioethics</strong> (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2003),<br />

introduction to chapter 10.<br />

12<br />

See Taking Care, p. x.<br />

13<br />

<strong>Human</strong> Cloning <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Dignity</strong>, p. 87; The President’s Council on <strong>Bioethics</strong>,<br />

Monitoring Stem Cell Research (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office,<br />

2004), p. 92.<br />

14<br />

The President’s Council on <strong>Bioethics</strong>, Alternative Sources of <strong>Human</strong> Pluripotent<br />

Stem Cells: A White Paper (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2005),<br />

p. 43; <strong>Human</strong> Cloning <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Dignity</strong>, p. ix.<br />

15<br />

<strong>Human</strong> Cloning <strong>and</strong> <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Dignity</strong>, p. 14.<br />

16<br />

The President’s Council on <strong>Bioethics</strong>, Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology <strong>and</strong> the Pursuit<br />

of Happiness (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2003), p. 103.<br />

17<br />

Martha Nussbaum, Frontiers of Justice, p. 44 (emphasis added). I hasten to add<br />

that, as will be apparent in the next section, I do not take Nussbaum to be a proponent<br />

of the Fittingness Argument. The quotation here is simply a prominent <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!