18.05.2015 Views

Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...

Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...

Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

122 STRATEGY, IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION<br />

actions set for and the resources allocated to the other activities. This is called<br />

alignment or fit, which is an essential element of strategy implementation.<br />

In this chapter, we will focus on recent issues in strategy and directions for<br />

information strategy formation and implementation in health care. We will do so<br />

by presenting the debate between theory and practice. We will also address the<br />

question whether health care and health care information management are<br />

different from other socio-economical activities from the strategy point of view,<br />

and whether they thus merit separate treatment. Next, we will distil general<br />

directions for new approaches to health care information strategy. In the next<br />

chapter, these issues will be filled in further in a series of concrete steps to take<br />

and issues to consider in developing an information strategy.<br />

Because of the importance of the alignment of information strategy to an<br />

organization’s overall strategy, we will start our discussion ‘top-down’.<br />

DO WE KNOW WHAT STRATEGY ACTUALLY IS?<br />

In an article called ‘What is strategy?’ (Porter 1996), Michael E.Porter, perhaps<br />

the world’s most widely read author on competitive strategy, distinguishes<br />

between strategy and the operational effectiveness focus, which dominated<br />

business until at least the mid—1990s. Although he does not address health care<br />

as such in this article, there are some lessons to be learned from his approach for<br />

this industry as well. Operational effectiveness is about productivity, quality and<br />

speed. In other words, do we perform similar activities better than rivals?<br />

Strategy, according to Porter, is about choosing to perform different activities<br />

than rivals or perform the same activities in a different way. Why do these<br />

approaches work out in a different way? If organizations try to compete on doing<br />

the same things better than their rivals, they actually compete on their ability to<br />

adopt best practices. It has turned out that many companies can become quite<br />

good at that game, thus collectively improving operational effectiveness in<br />

absolute terms. Relatively, however, this ability to adopt best practices does not<br />

help them much. It does not translate into a sustainable competitive advantage.<br />

Strategy is about choosing to perform (certain) activities other companies do not<br />

perform, or perform them in a different way. These choices make the company<br />

different, with the goal of creating a unique and valuable position. Choosing to<br />

be different also implies choosing not to be everything to everybody.<br />

Finally, as opposed to operational effectiveness, strategy is about what Porter<br />

calls fit (others would call this alignment). Whereas operational effectiveness is<br />

about performing certain individual activities better than rivals, strategy is about<br />

combining the disparate activities effectively. Strategic fit among activities is<br />

fundamental to competitive advantage, and it is also crucial to the ability to<br />

sustain that advantage.<br />

In order to implement the choice to be different and to create an effective fit,<br />

planning horizons should be longer than just a single planning cycle, but cover a<br />

decade or more. Strategy, according to Porter, is the core responsibility of general

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!