18.05.2015 Views

Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...

Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...

Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 STARTING POINTS<br />

organizations established a special taskforce on automation in general<br />

practice. This taskforce was to lead the automation of the GPs practices.<br />

The GP organizations explicitly aimed at developing an information system<br />

that would benefit the entire profession, and that would develop into a<br />

comprehensive General Practitioner <strong>Information</strong> System (GPIS) (including<br />

financial administration, but also a fully fledged EPR).<br />

Initially, however, the efforts of the automation taskforce were primarily<br />

geared towards the automation of financial transactions, because in this<br />

area the practical gains seemed most obvious. Bills ‘which otherwise had<br />

to be produced at night and over the weekend’ no longer had to be<br />

handwritten, but would be produced by the computer more or less<br />

automatically. This would save much time and free general physicians from<br />

doing boring clerical work (Esch, LHV, personal communication).<br />

From the beginning, however, the so-called ‘medical module’ of GPIS<br />

was also an important focus of attention for the professional organizations.<br />

User groups were established to ensure the continuity of both the software<br />

and the contacts with the software producer, while the automation<br />

taskforce took the initiative to write a Reference Model in which the basic<br />

requirements of a GPIS were formulated. The addresses where bills were<br />

to be sent to had to be unambiguously clear, it had to be possible to include<br />

the patient’s medical history, and it had to be possible to mark individual<br />

records with the electronic equivalent of the ‘coloured tabs’ they had used<br />

for their paper records. Following Lawrence Weed, the patient record was<br />

to be problem oriented. This meant that all data, action plans and progress<br />

notes were to be organized around the problem(s) of the patient rather than<br />

kept in mere chronological order (or, as in hospitals, by organizational<br />

function).<br />

On the basis of the first and later developed Reference Models, the<br />

existing software packages were tested and certified. The GP association<br />

commissioned a report on the projected quality improvements GPIS would<br />

have for its members and the health insurance companies. After its<br />

assessment of the report, the Dutch government decided to provide a<br />

subsidy to general physicians who purchased a certified GPIS as of 1 July<br />

1991.<br />

Part and parcel of the problem oriented record was the SOAP structure<br />

(Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan), according to which the GP<br />

should categorize his entries. In addition, entries like ‘diagnosis’ and<br />

‘medication’ could all be coded. This structure was meant to discipline a GP<br />

to treat each problem or symptom according to the same procedure and<br />

register data accordingly; structured data were required for research<br />

purposes, but also to afford basic functionalities such as allergy warnings<br />

and so forth.<br />

In practice, however, much of the record consists of free text entries.<br />

There are great variations between practices as to what extent they

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!