Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...
Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...
Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INFORMATION STRATEGY: AN INTRODUCTION 133<br />
■<br />
■<br />
improved integrated technology management;<br />
less management effort to achieve integrated network and systems.<br />
Potential disadvantages are:<br />
■<br />
■<br />
■<br />
missing out on more sophisticated applications offered by other vendors;<br />
dependency in case vendor is purchased or goes out of business;<br />
vendors may charge integration fees anyway.<br />
Some hospitals even outsource their IT departments to the single source<br />
supplier. Some organizations hold shared strategy sessions with their<br />
supplier. Most single source suppliers will integrate systems from other<br />
vendors if clients decide to choose for such a solution or they may have an<br />
alliance with vendors of systems which they cannot provide themselves<br />
and act as main contractors. An intermediate approach is the so-called<br />
‘best-of-cluster’ strategy (Kelly 2002).<br />
From the hospital strategy point of view, IT capabilities should be<br />
aligned with process improvement or other developments in the<br />
organization. In practice, obtaining the proper systems can be the subject<br />
of a complicated internal negotiation process, which will also involve<br />
external stakeholders, such as (potential) vendors and consultants, amongst<br />
others. Given the great number of systems hospitals tend to use on the one<br />
hand and the need for integration of information on the other, alignment of<br />
the IT portfolio as a whole is imperative. Long term contracts may<br />
facilitate or hamper an organization’s ability to adapt to evolving strategies.<br />
Careful consideration of which systems may qualify for a single source<br />
strategy is necessary.<br />
IT infrastructures that are intended to standardize work processes on the level of<br />
the organizations as a whole are adopted locally in many different ways.<br />
The deployed infrastructure (i.e. as it is being used) thus has to be considered as<br />
the outcome of interactions between ‘top-down’ design and ‘bottom-up’<br />
adoption. Insights from the local level frequently are adopted at the top level.<br />
Combining ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ approaches creatively will allow<br />
organizations to harness the power of the periphery, as opposed to seeing it as a<br />
source of resistance (ibid.).<br />
SUMMARY<br />
In this chapter, we have discussed strategy issues, related to integrating IT in<br />
health care work. Building on the first part of this book, we have taken the<br />
position that the formation and implementation of health care IT strategy has<br />
proven to be problematic. We have set out to find out why this may be the case<br />
and to discover approaches that may be more successful.