18.05.2015 Views

Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...

Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...

Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INFORMATION STRATEGY: AN INTRODUCTION 133<br />

■<br />

■<br />

improved integrated technology management;<br />

less management effort to achieve integrated network and systems.<br />

Potential disadvantages are:<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

missing out on more sophisticated applications offered by other vendors;<br />

dependency in case vendor is purchased or goes out of business;<br />

vendors may charge integration fees anyway.<br />

Some hospitals even outsource their IT departments to the single source<br />

supplier. Some organizations hold shared strategy sessions with their<br />

supplier. Most single source suppliers will integrate systems from other<br />

vendors if clients decide to choose for such a solution or they may have an<br />

alliance with vendors of systems which they cannot provide themselves<br />

and act as main contractors. An intermediate approach is the so-called<br />

‘best-of-cluster’ strategy (Kelly 2002).<br />

From the hospital strategy point of view, IT capabilities should be<br />

aligned with process improvement or other developments in the<br />

organization. In practice, obtaining the proper systems can be the subject<br />

of a complicated internal negotiation process, which will also involve<br />

external stakeholders, such as (potential) vendors and consultants, amongst<br />

others. Given the great number of systems hospitals tend to use on the one<br />

hand and the need for integration of information on the other, alignment of<br />

the IT portfolio as a whole is imperative. Long term contracts may<br />

facilitate or hamper an organization’s ability to adapt to evolving strategies.<br />

Careful consideration of which systems may qualify for a single source<br />

strategy is necessary.<br />

IT infrastructures that are intended to standardize work processes on the level of<br />

the organizations as a whole are adopted locally in many different ways.<br />

The deployed infrastructure (i.e. as it is being used) thus has to be considered as<br />

the outcome of interactions between ‘top-down’ design and ‘bottom-up’<br />

adoption. Insights from the local level frequently are adopted at the top level.<br />

Combining ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ approaches creatively will allow<br />

organizations to harness the power of the periphery, as opposed to seeing it as a<br />

source of resistance (ibid.).<br />

SUMMARY<br />

In this chapter, we have discussed strategy issues, related to integrating IT in<br />

health care work. Building on the first part of this book, we have taken the<br />

position that the formation and implementation of health care IT strategy has<br />

proven to be problematic. We have set out to find out why this may be the case<br />

and to discover approaches that may be more successful.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!