Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...
Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...
Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
44 STARTING POINTS<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
In one of his classical works, the organizational sociologist Henry Mintzberg has<br />
argued that the coordination of worktasks is a fundamental necessity for an<br />
organization (1979). The activities of the individual(s) managing the<br />
organization’s resources, to mention a simple example, have to be coordinated<br />
with the activities of the individual(s) using those resources. A very small<br />
organization can survive on mere ‘coordination by feedback’: the direct<br />
coordination of work through direct supervision or informal communication<br />
between the (few) employees. Larger organizations draw upon standardization<br />
and technologies to tackle their increased coordination needs. When worktasks<br />
are explicated and standardized, for example, the necessary coordination is<br />
‘programmed’ into these specifications, and is then subsequently automatically<br />
ensured. Likewise, the invention of the ‘record’, the filing cabinet and crossreferencing<br />
and indexing systems made it possible for an increasingly complex<br />
organization to handle an increasing number of clients. Such records are highly<br />
efficient ‘externalized’ memories—making the continuous handling of one<br />
individual by many different organizational members possible without the need<br />
for constant face-to-face contact between those members.<br />
Following Mintzberg, Lars Groth has argued that the revolutionary impact of<br />
IT is that it enables new coordination mechanisms, and thereby makes new forms<br />
of organization possible. As an example, he discusses the design of the Boeing<br />
777: the first aeroplane that was fully designed using an integrated CAD/CAE<br />
(computer aided design/engineering) system. This software did away with much<br />
of the traditional model- and mock-up building: it could display each designed<br />
part as a 3D picture, and would automatically detect whether any two planned<br />
parts would occupy the same point in space. More significantly, it made it possible<br />
for several thousand engineers (in different geographical locations) to<br />
collaboratively work on one project ‘in real time’. An integrated database<br />
connected all their workstations, so that each engineer could monitor and check<br />
upon the work on parts and requirements that would affect his own work (1999,<br />
pp. 310–12).<br />
There would seem to be a great need for IT’s enhanced coordination capacities<br />
in health care. The move towards integrated care, in which care processes are<br />
redesigned around patients’ needs, breaking through traditional boundaries<br />
between professionals, professions and institutions, would seem to be much<br />
helped by even a fraction of the coordinating power that Boeing’s IT unleashed.<br />
As we discussed in the previous chapter, the current development of PCIS aims<br />
to structure and support the ‘core business process’ of health care: the primary<br />
care process. <strong>Integrating</strong> patient record systems with order-entry, integral<br />
medication management, inter-disciplinary carepaths and quality control<br />
functionalities are all seen to be the way of the future.<br />
Yet at this point, analysts such as Mintzberg and Groth have a great<br />
disappointment in store. IT can only bring true organizational transformation