18.05.2015 Views

Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...

Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...

Health Information Management: Integrating Information Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WAITING FOR GODOT 27<br />

expected. Still, these schemes had a great impact on shaping further<br />

developments in UK computing for primary care. An interviewee explains<br />

how the computers used in the late 1980s were all set up for filling in data<br />

for secondary purposes:<br />

In the 1990s some GPs began using computers for administration.<br />

That really came in with the fundholding, which came here in the<br />

nineties, but the computer systems were set up before that. They<br />

were set up with the idea that they would, you know, eventually<br />

provide a way of recording all GP data. Diagnostic data, information<br />

about tests as well as prescribing data and information about the<br />

patients. So there were fields there for blood pressures, fields there<br />

for putting in weights, fields there for putting in smoking habits…all<br />

sorts of informational things.<br />

One political initiative that pushed the development of an EPR along was<br />

the fundholding enterprise. In the early 1990s under the Margaret Thatcher<br />

government the funder-provider split was removed, and GPs were<br />

requested to administer finances for their patients’ use of some secondary<br />

care. GPs who wanted to become fundholders needed computer technology<br />

to handle this. In addition, they had to report on these activities to the<br />

health authorities, which similarly required increased registration and<br />

information handling.<br />

The National Service Frameworks programme, launched in 1998, set out<br />

to ‘establish performance milestones’ (NSF website) against which<br />

progress within an agreed area could be measured. To have the audit<br />

programs work, GPs had to increasingly use diagnostic codes (Read codes)<br />

when filling data into their EPRs. The coded information would<br />

subsequently be transformed into publications that would outline<br />

guidelines for treatment within specific areas (such as cancer, child care or<br />

diabetes).<br />

Within the last five years, GPs as well as voices within the government<br />

have argued for a change of classification system. The Read codes, it is<br />

argued, are too specific to be used for collecting high quality data for the<br />

above-mentioned purposes. The NHS has looked towards the United States<br />

for a classification system with a more hierarchical structure. Presently,<br />

work is being done to integrate the SNOMED classification in the UK GPs<br />

computer systems as the main classification for data registration.<br />

The Dutch situation: the problem-oriented medical record in action<br />

In the beginning of the 1980s, small informal groups of Dutch GPs<br />

began to experiment with newly bought personal computers. Their first<br />

initiatives were mainly directed at handling their financial administration<br />

and the processing of bills. In 1985, the two major Dutch professional GP

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!