17.11.2012 Views

Conrad and Masculinity

Conrad and Masculinity

Conrad and Masculinity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Masculinity</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Body 89<br />

mother <strong>and</strong> with the furniture ... The furniture was disposed to the<br />

best advantage all over the house, but Mrs. Verloc’s mother was<br />

confined to two back rooms.<br />

(10)<br />

The furniture seems to come off best out of this arrangement; only in<br />

retrospect, or on second reading, are we struck by a parallel with<br />

Stevie’s body, ‘disposed’ (though hardly ‘to the best advantage’) over<br />

Greenwich Park, ‘disposed of’ all too effectively in one sense, but also<br />

hard to dispose of, since the police have to scrape it up with a shovel.<br />

Given the tension in theories of the body between the sense of the<br />

body as site of social meaning, <strong>and</strong> the idea of it as resistant to such<br />

meaning, there is a significant oscillation in the novel between the<br />

ideas of Stevie’s body as meaningful or meaningless. <strong>Masculinity</strong> itself<br />

constitutes an attribution of meaning to the body, marked as male.<br />

Stevie is ambiguous in this respect, an ambiguity which is introduced<br />

in the context of writing itself: ‘He was delicate <strong>and</strong>, in a frail way,<br />

good-looking, too, except for the vacant droop of his lower lip ... He<br />

had learned to read <strong>and</strong> write, notwithst<strong>and</strong>ing the unfavourable<br />

aspect of the lower lip’ (8). Though his bodily limitations do not<br />

prevent him learning to write, it is what is already written on his body<br />

that is to determine the course of his life. His positive attributes (‘delicate<br />

<strong>and</strong>, in a frail way, good-looking’) tend to the conventionally<br />

feminine, while his marks of conventional masculinity are partial <strong>and</strong><br />

ambivalent: ‘a growth of thin fluffy hair had come to blur, like a<br />

golden mist, the sharp line of his small lower jaw’ (10). His negative<br />

attributes inscribe on his body his lack of rational subjecthood (‘the<br />

vacant droop of his lower lip’). The only form of inscription in which<br />

we see him engaged is the drawing of circles with compass <strong>and</strong> pencil<br />

(45). While Stevie’s ability to write indicates a degree of rational<br />

subjecthood, his drawing seems only to confirm his status as symbolic<br />

victim, since the circles suggest, among other things, the circles of<br />

deceit <strong>and</strong> conspiracy that lead to his death <strong>and</strong> the symbolic centrality<br />

of the place of that death (the meridian at Greenwich). Mark<br />

Wollaeger sees Stevie’s circles, <strong>and</strong> other geometric details in the text<br />

(such as Verloc’s code ‘name’, which is a triangle) in terms of a ‘play<br />

between geometry <strong>and</strong> chaos’, <strong>and</strong> associates this with ‘the attack on<br />

the body’ in the novel, which he sees as an expression of <strong>Conrad</strong>’s<br />

‘desire for order’ (FS, 150–1). Wollaeger’s argument is that a certain<br />

fantasy of rational order requires complete control of others, <strong>and</strong> a<br />

complete transparency of individuals. This desire to control <strong>and</strong> see

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!