17.11.2012 Views

Conrad and Masculinity

Conrad and Masculinity

Conrad and Masculinity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Masculinity</strong>, ‘Woman’ <strong>and</strong> Truth 141<br />

oppression as a possessed object. As in ‘Heart of Darkness’, confessing<br />

to a woman is a tempting but terrifying possibility. The woman is held<br />

to represent a ‘sacred’ or metaphysical truth <strong>and</strong> to protect this role as<br />

living embodiment of an ‘ultimate’ truth she must be denied knowledge<br />

of mundane truths, of men’s truths. Here, though, it is not the<br />

potentially sympathetic figure of Marlow who seeks to enforce such<br />

protection, but the corrupt <strong>and</strong> grotesque Verloc. Male critics (or<br />

readers) are unlikely to ‘identify the imaginative autobiography of<br />

their masculinity’ with that of Verloc, as Straus argues they do with<br />

that of Marlow (EI, 130).<br />

In Under Western Eyes as in ‘Heart of Darkness’ we find an idealized<br />

figure of a beautiful young woman, from whom the truth of a male<br />

crime must be kept. However, in this case the concealment becomes<br />

unbearable to the man who knows of that crime. The result is the<br />

novel’s climactic double confession, to Natalia Haldin <strong>and</strong> to the<br />

assembled Russian revolutionaries. It is the latter confession which, in<br />

literal <strong>and</strong> realistic terms, leads to the deafening <strong>and</strong> crippling of<br />

Razumov. Nevertheless, symbolically this punishment, leading to his<br />

anticipated early death, seems to confirm the taboo established in<br />

‘Heart of Darkness’ on the passing of male secrets to a woman. The<br />

parallel with ‘Heart of Darkness’ is evident when, for example, Natalia<br />

expresses the hope of learning from Razumov some of her brother’s<br />

last words (137), just as the Intended asks Marlow for Kurtz’s last<br />

words, <strong>and</strong> also when the language-teacher describes Natalia as ‘a<br />

frank <strong>and</strong> generous creature, having the noblest—well—illusions’<br />

(192). The crime that Razumov confesses is his own, not that of<br />

another, <strong>and</strong> we know what that crime was: the betrayal of Natalia’s<br />

brother to torture <strong>and</strong> execution at the h<strong>and</strong>s of the Russian state. It<br />

is not a question, as with Kurtz <strong>and</strong> Marlow, of some unspeakable<br />

transgression with sexual overtones. Or is it? Razumov has something<br />

worse to confess (he feels) even than his betrayal of Victor Haldin to<br />

the authorities:<br />

Listen—now comes the true confession. The other was nothing. To<br />

save me, your trustful eyes had to entice my thought to the very<br />

edge of the blackest treachery ... Victor Haldin had stolen the truth<br />

of my life from me, who had nothing else in the world, <strong>and</strong> he<br />

boasted of living on through you on this earth where I had no place<br />

to lay my head. She will marry some day, he had said—<strong>and</strong> your<br />

eyes were trustful. And do you know what I said to myself? I shall<br />

steal his sister’s soul from her ... If you could have looked then into

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!