Conrad and Masculinity
Conrad and Masculinity
Conrad and Masculinity
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Masculinity</strong>, ‘Woman’ <strong>and</strong> Truth 155<br />
are really women. And it’s no use talking of opportunities either. I<br />
know that some of them do talk of it. But not the genuine women.<br />
Those know better. Nothing can beat a true woman for a clear<br />
vision of reality.<br />
(C, 281)<br />
Here, as elsewhere, Marlow seems to combine some underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />
the social oppression which forced certain roles onto women (‘a man<br />
can struggle’) with a rather patronizing essentialism (‘wisdom ... of<br />
their own kind. But they are not made for attack’). Also typical of a<br />
number of his assertions about women is his passing reference to<br />
possibilities for emancipation (‘talking of opportunities’) which he<br />
dismisses by means of a circular argument: women who are interested<br />
in opportunities are not the ‘genuine women’, so that women are<br />
proved to be essentially passive by only counting as women those who<br />
conform. Interestingly, though, Marlow associates this supposed<br />
passivity with ‘a clear vision of reality’. In Nostromo the narrator<br />
observes that ‘action is consolatory. It is the enemy of thought <strong>and</strong><br />
the friend of flattering illusions’ (66). Presumably, then, women’s<br />
‘clear vision of reality’ may, in Marlow’s theory, derive from their<br />
inability to act. 22 Such a vision might be reached through ‘attention<br />
[which] originated in idleness’, a phrase which <strong>Conrad</strong> uses to<br />
describe his own creative meditation on the figure of Lena in Victory<br />
(‘Author’s Note’, V, xv). Thus Marlow’s definition of the otherness of<br />
the female rebounds on itself, for not only is Marlow’s own role in the<br />
events that he narrates in Chance largely a passive one of observing<br />
<strong>and</strong> waiting, but he repeatedly claims for himself, on the basis of this<br />
detachment from the action, precisely that ‘clear vision of reality’<br />
which, on his own account, is denied to those men more involved in<br />
the action of the story than he. In relation to the climax of events on<br />
board the Ferndale, recounted to Marlow by the second mate, Powell,<br />
Marlow claims that:<br />
The inwardness of what was passing before his eyes was hidden<br />
from him [i.e. Powell], who had looked on, more impenetrably<br />
than from me who at a distance of years was listening to his words.<br />
(426)<br />
Marlow’s language here, as in many places, suggests a strong voyeuristic<br />
element: the scene to which he refers culminates in the sexual<br />
consummation of Captain Anthony’s marriage to Flora, a woman