17.11.2012 Views

Conrad and Masculinity

Conrad and Masculinity

Conrad and Masculinity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

228 Notes<br />

18 Martin Ray notes that Chance sold 13 000 copies in the first two years,<br />

three times as many as Under Western Eyes in the corresponding period.<br />

Martin Ray, Introduction to Chance (Oxford: Oxford University Press,<br />

1988), pp. vii–xix (p. vi).<br />

19 On the question of the novel’s putative appeal to women readers, see<br />

Laurence Davies, ‘<strong>Conrad</strong>, Chance <strong>and</strong> Women Readers’, in CG, 75–88.<br />

20 Ray, p. x.<br />

21 Roberts, ‘Secret Agents <strong>and</strong> Secret Objects’.<br />

22 This is a notable reversal of the attitude of the Marlow of ‘Heart of<br />

Darkness’, who notoriously claims that women’s lack of involvement in<br />

worldly action renders them ‘out of touch with truth’ (59).<br />

23 On the distinction between story time (the time in which events occur)<br />

<strong>and</strong> narrative time (the time of their telling), see Genette, p. 35.<br />

24 This process clearly extends into the critical debate about feminist <strong>and</strong><br />

gender issues in <strong>Conrad</strong>’s work, in so far as male critics participate in this.<br />

Scott McCracken commented, as he <strong>and</strong> I were exchanging drafts <strong>and</strong> ideas<br />

on the subject, that ‘all this traffic between us must surely amount to a<br />

textual configuration in itself: men writing to men about <strong>Conrad</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

women.’ Thus <strong>Conrad</strong>’s narrative strategy takes on a form of life outside<br />

his text, continuing to dem<strong>and</strong> self-questioning by men.<br />

25 Daphna Erdinast-Vulcan, ‘Textuality <strong>and</strong> Surrogacy in <strong>Conrad</strong>’s Chance’,<br />

L’Époque <strong>Conrad</strong>ienne (1989), 51–65 (pp. 64, 54–5).<br />

Chapter 7 Vision, Power <strong>and</strong> Homosocial Exchange<br />

1 Critics who deal with aspects of the visual in <strong>Conrad</strong>’s work include: David<br />

Simpson, Fetishism & Imagination: Dickens, Melville, <strong>Conrad</strong> (Baltimore, MD<br />

<strong>and</strong> London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982), p. 102ff.; Moser, pp.<br />

111–30; Leo Gurko, Joseph <strong>Conrad</strong>: Giant in Exile (New York: Macmillan,<br />

1962), pp. 197–223. Gurko makes the misogynist assumption, derived<br />

from Moser, that women who show determination are thereby exhibiting<br />

‘sexual aggressiveness’ (Gurko, p. 202).<br />

2 On <strong>Conrad</strong>’s use of the romance genre, see Hampson, Joseph <strong>Conrad</strong>;<br />

Betrayal <strong>and</strong> Identity, p. 25 <strong>and</strong> Erdinast-Vulcan, Joseph <strong>Conrad</strong> <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Modern Temper, pp. 186–95, 197–200.<br />

3 See Evelyn Fox Keller <strong>and</strong> Christine R. Grontkowski, ‘The Mind’s Eye’, in<br />

Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics,<br />

Methodology, <strong>and</strong> Philosophy of Science, eds S<strong>and</strong>ra Harding <strong>and</strong> Merril B.<br />

Hintikka (Dordrecht, Boston <strong>and</strong> London: D. Reidel, 1983), pp. 207–24.<br />

4 Edward Said, The World, the Text <strong>and</strong> the Critic, pp. 93–4.<br />

5 Watt, <strong>Conrad</strong> in the Nineteenth Century, p. 79.<br />

6 Koestenbaum, p. 169.<br />

7 Derrida argues that the white/black, light/dark oppositions are fundamental<br />

to Western metaphysics. See Jacques Derrida, ‘The White Mythology:<br />

Metaphor in the Text of Philosophy’, Margins of Philosophy, trans. Alan Bass<br />

(Brighton: Harvester, 1982), pp. 207–71.<br />

8 Martin Jay, Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century<br />

French Thought (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1993), p. 526.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!