17.11.2012 Views

Conrad and Masculinity

Conrad and Masculinity

Conrad and Masculinity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

216 Notes<br />

However, one knows that Haggard’s heroes (unlike <strong>Conrad</strong>’s) will succeed<br />

in this aim. See H. Rider Haggard, Allan Quatermain (1887; London: George<br />

Harrap, 1931), dedication, p. 5.<br />

37 King Solomon’s Mines, p. 283.<br />

38 Edward Garnett, Introduction to Letters from <strong>Conrad</strong> 1895 to 1924 (London:<br />

Nonesuch, 1928), ed. Edward Garnett, p. xiii.<br />

39 Robert Young, White Mythologies: Writing History <strong>and</strong> the West (London <strong>and</strong><br />

New York: Routledge, 1990), p. 124.<br />

40 Young, p. 125.<br />

41 Gail Ching-Liang Low, White Skins, Black Masks: Representation <strong>and</strong><br />

Colonialism (London <strong>and</strong> New York: Routledge, 1996), p. 48.<br />

42 Jeremy Hawthorn, who has examined in detail the ideological implications<br />

of <strong>Conrad</strong>’s use of free indirect discourse, discusses the variety of terminology<br />

used to identify the different ways of representing speech <strong>and</strong><br />

thought. See NT, Chapter One. What I am calling interior monologue<br />

might also be termed direct discourse, while what I am terming ‘narratorial<br />

comment’ is usefully defined by Hawthorn as ‘an extra-mimetic<br />

narrative perspective’: that is, a narrative voice from ‘outside the created<br />

world of the fictional text’, ‘from a different level of reality from that in<br />

which the characters live’ (NT, 2, 62).<br />

43 Ruth L. Nadelhaft, Joseph <strong>Conrad</strong> (Feminist Readings Series) (Hemel<br />

Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), p. 31.<br />

44 Terry Eagleton, Criticism <strong>and</strong> Ideology: A Study in Marxist Literary Theory<br />

(London: Verso, 1976), p. 135.<br />

45 Linda Ruth Williams, Critical Desire: Psychoanalysis <strong>and</strong> the Literary Subject<br />

(London: Edward Arnold, 1995), p. 157.<br />

46 Sigmund Freud, The Ego <strong>and</strong> the Id, in The St<strong>and</strong>ard Edition of the Complete<br />

Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, trans. under the general editorship of<br />

James Strachey in collaboration with Anna Freud, assisted by Alix Strachey<br />

<strong>and</strong> Alan Tyson, 24 vols (London: Hogarth Press, 1953–74), XIX, pp. 1–66<br />

(p. 54).<br />

47 Williams, p. 159.<br />

48 Freud, Beyond the Pleasure Principle, in The St<strong>and</strong>ard Edition of the Complete<br />

Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, XVIII, pp. 1–64 (p. 38).<br />

49 Elizabeth Bronfen, entry on ‘death-drive (Freud)’, in Feminism <strong>and</strong><br />

Psychoanalysis: A Critical Dictionary, ed. Elizabeth Wright (Oxford <strong>and</strong><br />

Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1992), p. 56.<br />

50 My thinking on this point goes back to a conference paper given by<br />

Padmini Mongia at the 1992 conference of the Joseph <strong>Conrad</strong> Society<br />

(UK), subsequently published as ‘Ghosts of the Gothic: Spectral Women<br />

<strong>and</strong> Colonized Spaces in Lord Jim’, CG, 1–15. In the paper <strong>and</strong> the ensuing<br />

discussion she pointed out the inability of <strong>Conrad</strong>’s texts to represent<br />

female sexual desire with conviction.<br />

51 Hampson, Betrayal <strong>and</strong> Identity, p. 26.<br />

52 On focalization, see Gérard Genette, Narrative Discourse, trans. Jane E.<br />

Lewin (1980; Oxford: Blackwell, 1986), pp. 189–94. The conclusion of<br />

Chapter One of Almayer’s Folly (pp. 19–20) is an example of external focalization<br />

on Nina, describing what she sees, but only the references to her<br />

looking ‘eagerly’ <strong>and</strong> with ‘a steady <strong>and</strong> anxious gaze’ hint at what her

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!