Conrad and Masculinity
Conrad and Masculinity
Conrad and Masculinity
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Harold Bloom, The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry (Oxford: Oxford<br />
University Press, 1973), p. 30.<br />
26 Ruppel, p. 35.<br />
27 Ruppel, pp. 23–34.<br />
28 Ruppel, p. 24.<br />
29 Heidi Hartmann, ‘The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism <strong>and</strong> Feminism:<br />
Towards a More Progressive Union’, in Women <strong>and</strong> Revolution: A Discussion<br />
of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism <strong>and</strong> Feminism, ed. Lydia Sargent<br />
(Boston: South End Press, 1981), pp. 1–41 (p. 14); quoted BM, 3.<br />
30 See BM, 26 <strong>and</strong> EC, 36n, 154.<br />
31 For a discussion of the ‘achievement <strong>and</strong> decline’ thesis, derived from<br />
Thomas Moser’s Joseph <strong>Conrad</strong>: Achievement <strong>and</strong> Decline (Cambridge, MA:<br />
Harvard University Press, 1957), see Gary Geddes, <strong>Conrad</strong>’s Later Novels<br />
(Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1980), pp. 1–10 <strong>and</strong> passim;<br />
Hampson, Betrayal <strong>and</strong> Identity, pp. 1–2 <strong>and</strong> passim.<br />
Chapter 1 <strong>Masculinity</strong>, ‘Race’ <strong>and</strong> Empire<br />
Notes 213<br />
1 Paul Gilroy, ‘White Man’s Bonus’, review of Richard Dyer, White, Times<br />
Literary Supplement, 29 August 1997, p. 10.<br />
2 Kwame Anthony Appiah, ‘Race’, in Critical Terms for Literary Study, eds<br />
Frank Lentricchia <strong>and</strong> Thomas McLaughlin (Chicago <strong>and</strong> London:<br />
University of Chicago Press, 1990), pp. 274–87 (p. 276).<br />
3 Appiah suggests that ‘there is a fairly widespread consensus in the sciences<br />
of biology <strong>and</strong> anthropology that the word “race,” at least as it is used in<br />
most unscientific discussions, refers to nothing that science should recognize<br />
as real’ (Appiah, p. 277). While the debate concerning race within<br />
biology is clearly outside the scope of the present discussion, it may be of<br />
interest to note that a 1998 international conference of biologists <strong>and</strong><br />
palaeontologists was reported as showing growing support for the thesis<br />
that so-called racial differences ‘are the product of comparatively recent,<br />
<strong>and</strong> therefore superficial, adaptations to environment’. A ‘leading geneticist’,<br />
Walter Bodmer, was quoted as stating that ‘most of the genetic<br />
variation in human populations is found within any population, <strong>and</strong> a<br />
minority of it relates to difference between them. You can take a population<br />
of 1,000 from anywhere <strong>and</strong> they will have as much variation, almost,<br />
as a population of 1,000 sampled from all over the world. The differences<br />
between populations is far less than the differences within them. There is<br />
no credence to a demarcation of human populations into clearly separated<br />
population groups.’ The Guardian, 6 July 1998, p. 11.<br />
4 This includes the affirmative use of a form of ‘racial’ identity by groups<br />
which have been oppressed on racist grounds (for example forms of black<br />
identity).<br />
5 ‘Karain’, together with ‘The Lagoon’ which is a shorter work with some<br />
related features, was collected in the 1898 volume Tales of Unrest. Of the<br />
other stories in that volume, ‘The Idiots’ <strong>and</strong> ‘The Return’ have European<br />
settings, while ‘An Outpost of Progress’, set in Africa, is a much more<br />
directly satirical piece than <strong>Conrad</strong>’s other early ‘imperial’ fiction.