17.11.2012 Views

Conrad and Masculinity

Conrad and Masculinity

Conrad and Masculinity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Harold Bloom, The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry (Oxford: Oxford<br />

University Press, 1973), p. 30.<br />

26 Ruppel, p. 35.<br />

27 Ruppel, pp. 23–34.<br />

28 Ruppel, p. 24.<br />

29 Heidi Hartmann, ‘The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism <strong>and</strong> Feminism:<br />

Towards a More Progressive Union’, in Women <strong>and</strong> Revolution: A Discussion<br />

of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism <strong>and</strong> Feminism, ed. Lydia Sargent<br />

(Boston: South End Press, 1981), pp. 1–41 (p. 14); quoted BM, 3.<br />

30 See BM, 26 <strong>and</strong> EC, 36n, 154.<br />

31 For a discussion of the ‘achievement <strong>and</strong> decline’ thesis, derived from<br />

Thomas Moser’s Joseph <strong>Conrad</strong>: Achievement <strong>and</strong> Decline (Cambridge, MA:<br />

Harvard University Press, 1957), see Gary Geddes, <strong>Conrad</strong>’s Later Novels<br />

(Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1980), pp. 1–10 <strong>and</strong> passim;<br />

Hampson, Betrayal <strong>and</strong> Identity, pp. 1–2 <strong>and</strong> passim.<br />

Chapter 1 <strong>Masculinity</strong>, ‘Race’ <strong>and</strong> Empire<br />

Notes 213<br />

1 Paul Gilroy, ‘White Man’s Bonus’, review of Richard Dyer, White, Times<br />

Literary Supplement, 29 August 1997, p. 10.<br />

2 Kwame Anthony Appiah, ‘Race’, in Critical Terms for Literary Study, eds<br />

Frank Lentricchia <strong>and</strong> Thomas McLaughlin (Chicago <strong>and</strong> London:<br />

University of Chicago Press, 1990), pp. 274–87 (p. 276).<br />

3 Appiah suggests that ‘there is a fairly widespread consensus in the sciences<br />

of biology <strong>and</strong> anthropology that the word “race,” at least as it is used in<br />

most unscientific discussions, refers to nothing that science should recognize<br />

as real’ (Appiah, p. 277). While the debate concerning race within<br />

biology is clearly outside the scope of the present discussion, it may be of<br />

interest to note that a 1998 international conference of biologists <strong>and</strong><br />

palaeontologists was reported as showing growing support for the thesis<br />

that so-called racial differences ‘are the product of comparatively recent,<br />

<strong>and</strong> therefore superficial, adaptations to environment’. A ‘leading geneticist’,<br />

Walter Bodmer, was quoted as stating that ‘most of the genetic<br />

variation in human populations is found within any population, <strong>and</strong> a<br />

minority of it relates to difference between them. You can take a population<br />

of 1,000 from anywhere <strong>and</strong> they will have as much variation, almost,<br />

as a population of 1,000 sampled from all over the world. The differences<br />

between populations is far less than the differences within them. There is<br />

no credence to a demarcation of human populations into clearly separated<br />

population groups.’ The Guardian, 6 July 1998, p. 11.<br />

4 This includes the affirmative use of a form of ‘racial’ identity by groups<br />

which have been oppressed on racist grounds (for example forms of black<br />

identity).<br />

5 ‘Karain’, together with ‘The Lagoon’ which is a shorter work with some<br />

related features, was collected in the 1898 volume Tales of Unrest. Of the<br />

other stories in that volume, ‘The Idiots’ <strong>and</strong> ‘The Return’ have European<br />

settings, while ‘An Outpost of Progress’, set in Africa, is a much more<br />

directly satirical piece than <strong>Conrad</strong>’s other early ‘imperial’ fiction.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!