17.11.2012 Views

Conrad and Masculinity

Conrad and Masculinity

Conrad and Masculinity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Masculinity</strong>, ‘Woman’ <strong>and</strong> Truth 145<br />

literally desire his sister, at least not in a sexual sense, but he possesses<br />

her through her devotion <strong>and</strong> admiration, <strong>and</strong> imaginatively places<br />

her in the role of his partner by implicitly seeing her as the mother of<br />

his spiritual posterity. Indeed, the fact that it is Natalia’s brother who,<br />

as it were, offers her to Razumov, places the situation more firmly<br />

within the structure outlined by Rubin, in which the incest taboo<br />

serves to establish relations of kinship between men through the<br />

exchange of women. All this, of course, takes place in a context which<br />

is both ironic <strong>and</strong> tragic, in which the exchange is also to become an<br />

(intended) revenge on Razumov’s part.<br />

However, it does not seem appropriate to describe Razumov’s<br />

heterosexual desire for Natalia in Sedgwick’s terms as ‘a more or less<br />

perfunctory detour on the way to a closer, but homophobically<br />

proscribed, bonding’ with her brother (<strong>and</strong> this is not merely because<br />

her brother is by this time dead). Razumov’s desire in relation to<br />

Victor Haldin seems primarily one of identification: the desire to be<br />

him, or to be in his place. Chosen because he has no family of his<br />

own, Razumov is tempted to steal Haldin’s family, to take his place as<br />

the idolized heroic young male in the eyes of Natalia <strong>and</strong> her mother.<br />

Haldin had boasted of ‘living on through’ Natalia’s children; instead<br />

Razumov, his betrayer, would appropriate this patriarchal line of<br />

succession. The <strong>Conrad</strong>ian theme of the double operates between<br />

Haldin <strong>and</strong> Razumov, given the tinge of the uncanny by Razumov’s<br />

(imagined) vision of Haldin lying corpse-like on his (Razumov’s) bed<br />

(32) <strong>and</strong> his (hallucinatory) vision of Haldin’s body in the snow<br />

(36–7). Of course Kurtz <strong>and</strong> Marlow also have aspects of doubling, <strong>and</strong><br />

Marlow’s fascination with Kurtz is an inextricable blend of identification<br />

<strong>and</strong> desire (as well as repulsion). It would, in principle, be<br />

possible to make the same argument that I made in relation to Marlow<br />

<strong>and</strong> Kurtz in respect of Razumov <strong>and</strong> Haldin: to read Razumov’s wish<br />

to be Haldin in terms of Sedgwick’s fifth transformation/denial of<br />

male homosexual love: ‘I do not love him, I am him’ (see Chapter 5<br />

above). However, the argument does not seem convincing in relation<br />

to Under Western Eyes. There are no evident overtones of the sexual in<br />

Razumov’s response to Haldin. Rather Razumov’s primary desire<br />

seems to be for a family <strong>and</strong> a place in the patriarchal succession: to<br />

that extent, <strong>and</strong> for those reasons, he would like to be Haldin, or to be<br />

his brother, as he would perhaps have liked to be brother to the two<br />

privileged girls who are in fact his half-sisters. All this is of course<br />

traceable to his virtually orphaned position as an illegitimate child,<br />

<strong>and</strong> to the figure of Prince K—. The latter, Razumov’s biological father,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!