17.11.2012 Views

Conrad and Masculinity

Conrad and Masculinity

Conrad and Masculinity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6<br />

<strong>Masculinity</strong>, ‘Woman’ <strong>and</strong> Truth:<br />

The Secret Agent, Under Western<br />

Eyes, Chance<br />

The gendered circulation of knowledge, which I have described in<br />

‘Heart of Darkness’, reappears in several of <strong>Conrad</strong>’s later works,<br />

notably The Secret Agent, Under Western Eyes <strong>and</strong> Chance, but in each<br />

it is disrupted or questioned to a greater degree. The basic paradigm<br />

is one in which knowledge, both literal knowledge of particular facts<br />

<strong>and</strong> events <strong>and</strong> existential knowledge, is sought, shared, competed<br />

for <strong>and</strong> otherwise circulated among groups of men, including the<br />

implied author, male narrators (such as Marlow or the languageteacher<br />

in Under Western Eyes), male narratees <strong>and</strong> implied male<br />

readers. This circulation involves <strong>and</strong> is facilitated by the exclusion<br />

of women from such knowledge, combined with a tendency to identify<br />

them symbolically with it. The women represent the truth,<br />

particularly ungraspable metaphysical truth, but they do not possess<br />

it. Another way of putting this would be to say that the exclusion of<br />

women from the space within which men’s knowledge circulates<br />

encourages the identification of the truth ‘beyond’, ultimate or unattainable<br />

truth, with the feminine. Jacques Derrida, summing up both<br />

the paradox <strong>and</strong> the logic of Nietzsche’s gendered epistemology, has<br />

commented on this incompatibility between representing <strong>and</strong><br />

possessing truth:<br />

How is it possible that woman, who herself is truth, does not<br />

believe in truth? And yet, how is it possible to be truth <strong>and</strong> still<br />

believe in it? 1<br />

One might gloss this with the observation that no one (at least no one<br />

sane) regards themselves as a symbol of ultimate truth or unattainable<br />

wisdom. Such a role is a projection of someone else’s fantasies <strong>and</strong><br />

137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!