17.11.2012 Views

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the usual manner. Line 1 in the figure indicates the (idealized) stress<br />

pattern on which M c would be normally based, corresponding to<br />

expression (8.2). Clearly this fails to utilise the full capacity of the web,<br />

since the stress at its top edge is well below the value p ° it can attain<br />

before buckling. Equation (8.2) therefore underestimates M c .<br />

An improved result may be obtained by employing an elasto-plastic<br />

treatment, in which a more favourable stress pattern is assumed with<br />

yield penetrating to the top of the web (line 2). The moment calculation<br />

is then based on line 2 instead of line 1. If the web is only just semicompact,<br />

M c is taken equal to the value M c2 calculated directly from line<br />

2, while, in the general semi-compact case, it is obtained by interpolation<br />

using equation (8.4), with the quantity Zp ° replaced by M c2 .<br />

When operating this method we allow for HAZ softening by using<br />

the gross section <strong>and</strong> reducing the stress in any HAZ region to k z2 p ° .<br />

8.2.8 Local buckling in an understressed compression flange<br />

Figure 8.5 shows a type of section in which the distance y c from the<br />

neutral axis to a slender compression flange X is less than the distance<br />

y t to the tension face. For such sections, local buckling in the compression<br />

flange becomes less critical because it is ‘understressed’, <strong>and</strong> the normal<br />

method of calculation will produce an oversafe estimate of M c . An<br />

improved result can be obtained by replacing the parameter � (=�(250/<br />

p ° )) in the local buckling calculations by a modified value �’ given by:<br />

(8.5)<br />

This may make it possible to re-classify the section as semi-compact, or,<br />

if it is still slender, a more favourable effective section will result. In<br />

either case, M c is increased.<br />

Note, however, that such a device should not be employed as a<br />

means for upgrading a section from semi-compact to fully compact.<br />

8.2.9 Biaxial moment<br />

We now turn to the case of asymmetric bending, when the applied<br />

moment has components about both the principal axes of the section.<br />

Figure 8.5 Understressed compression flange (X).<br />

Copyright 1999 by Taylor & Francis Group. All Rights Reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!