17.11.2012 Views

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 11.6 Fillet welded joint under eccentric load.<br />

length of the joint. Components P – 1 <strong>and</strong> P– 2 are then combined vectorially<br />

to produce P – , <strong>and</strong> hence the required components P – t (transverse) <strong>and</strong><br />

P – 1 (longitudinal).<br />

11.3.4 Calculated resistance, weld-metal failure<br />

The calculated resistance P – c per unit length of weld to either transverse<br />

or longitudinal loading on its own (Figure 11.4(a), (b)), based on weldmetal<br />

failure, may be found from:<br />

P – c =kagpw where: pw =limiting stress for weld metal,<br />

g=weld throat dimension,<br />

a=factor governed by weld geometry,<br />

k=1.0 for butts or 0.85 for fillets.<br />

(11.15)<br />

The limiting stress p w depends on the choice of filler, <strong>and</strong> Table 11.6<br />

lists the p w -values given by BS.8118. If the filler alloy is not known at<br />

the design stage, the lowest listed value of p w should be taken for the<br />

parent alloy concerned, corresponding to the weakest filler. When a<br />

stronger filler is used, there may be a greater risk of cracking <strong>and</strong> hence<br />

a need for tighter control in fabrication. This might for example apply<br />

when a 5183 filler (Al-Mg) is used for joining 6082 plates, with a 15%<br />

strength increase compared to one of the more tolerant 4xxx–type fillers<br />

(Al-Si). For a weld between dissimilar parent metals, the lower of the<br />

listed values for p w should be taken.<br />

Copyright 1999 by Taylor & Francis Group. All Rights Reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!