17.11.2012 Views

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 11.3 Comparisons with BS.8118—expressions for the limiting fastener stress<br />

Note. 1. f o , f u =proof (yield) <strong>and</strong> ultimate stress of bolt material.<br />

f op , f up =the same for ply material.<br />

2. For shear the bolts are assumed to be in normal clearance holes.<br />

3. Where two values are listed, the lower is taken (BS.8118).<br />

Table 11.4 Comparisons with BS.8118—typical limiting stresses for fasteners<br />

Note. 1. Materials covered:<br />

2. Bearing on ply. The stresses have been factored by k in order to allow for the joint geometry<br />

(Figure 11.2), assuming: (a) s=3d 0 , e=2d 0 ; (b) s=4d 0 , e=3d 0 where s=longitudinal pitch, e=edge<br />

distance, d 0 =hole diameter.<br />

1. Shear failure of fastener. The expressions for p s in Table 11.3 refer to<br />

bolts used in normal clearance holes. British St<strong>and</strong>ard BS.8118 allows<br />

a 12% higher value for close-fitting bolts, <strong>and</strong> 18% higher for colddriven<br />

rivets. Our proposals, like other codes, make no distinction.<br />

2. Bearing failure of plate. The two treatments effectively take different<br />

values for the joint-geometry factor k (Figure 11.2). In Table 11.4, the<br />

listed stresses for ply bearing have been multiplied by the relevant<br />

Copyright 1999 by Taylor & Francis Group. All Rights Reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!