17.11.2012 Views

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 9.10 Torsional buckling of monosymmetric sections, interaction factor k.<br />

2. Method B employs an effective section which takes advantage of the<br />

post-buckled strength of these elements, this effective section being<br />

used for the determination of p 1 In finding �, the method bases � s or<br />

� v on the same effective section, but all the other quantities are based<br />

on the gross section.<br />

As with column buckling, method B tends to be more favourable than<br />

method A at low �.<br />

9.6.10 Empirical slenderness formulae<br />

The torsional buckling slenderness � parameter may be obtained<br />

more simply for some conventional sections by using empirical<br />

formulae. These are taken from BS.8118 <strong>and</strong> relate to the shapes<br />

shown in Figures 9.11 <strong>and</strong> 9.13. The � slenderness is still found from<br />

the basic expression (9.10), but � with t now calculated using the<br />

appropriate data in Table 9.1 or 9.2. As before, k is read from Figure<br />

9.10. Note that the formulae in the two tables will be inaccurate if<br />

used outside the ranges indicated.<br />

1. Type-R sections. Figure 9.11 shows the shapes covered <strong>and</strong> the notation,<br />

the required formulae � for t being given in Table 9.1. The parameter<br />

in these is a measure of the fillet reinforcement defined as follows<br />

�<br />

(Figure 9.12):<br />

Copyright 1999 by Taylor & Francis Group. All Rights Reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!