17.11.2012 Views

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of fatigue, but the member had a low natural frequency of vibration<br />

<strong>and</strong>, in the unclad condition, wind-excited oscillations caused it to fail<br />

by flexural fatigue after a few weeks.<br />

Another non-obvious type of fatigue failure is that due to transverse<br />

stressing at the welds in slender plate-girders. If the web operates in<br />

the post-buckled condition, due to a very high d/t ratio, it will flex in<br />

<strong>and</strong> out each time the load is applied, causing repeated flexure about<br />

the axis of the web/flange joint <strong>and</strong> hence fatigue in the weld.<br />

The treatment of fatigue presented in this chapter is based on that in<br />

BS.8118, which was largely the work of Ogle <strong>and</strong> Maddox [30] at the<br />

TWI. The data provided for welded details refers specifically to arcwelded<br />

joints (MIG, TIG). Friction-stir welding is still in its infancy, but<br />

preliminary results suggest the FS process produces joints which are<br />

much better in fatigue than those made by MIG or TIG.<br />

12.2 POSSIBLE WAYS OF HANDLING FATIGUE<br />

There are three possible approaches for checking a proposed design<br />

against failure by fatigue:<br />

1. safe life method;<br />

2. fail-safe method (‘damage-tolerant’ approach);<br />

3. testing.<br />

The usual method (1), which is entirely done by calculation, is the one<br />

explained in this chapter. It essentially consists of estimating the range<br />

of stress fr , arising in service at any critical position, finding the<br />

corresponding endurance N from the relevant fr-N curve, <strong>and</strong> then<br />

checking that the resulting life is not less than that required.<br />

In method (2), the safety margins in design are lower than those<br />

required in a safe-life design. This is permissible because regular inspection<br />

is carried out, enabling the growth of any fatigue cracks to be monitored<br />

during the life of the structure. If the size of a crack or the rate of crack<br />

growth exceeds that allowed, the structure is taken out of service <strong>and</strong><br />

the critical component repaired or replaced. Obviously, it is essential<br />

that all potential fatigue sites should be easily inspectable if this method<br />

is to be adopted, <strong>and</strong> considerable expertise is needed. Inspection methods,<br />

the time between inspections, acceptable crack lengths <strong>and</strong> allowable<br />

rates of crack growth must all be agreed between the designer <strong>and</strong> the<br />

user of the structure. When fatigue is critical, the fail-safe method will<br />

tend to produce a lighter structure than method (1). It is the approach<br />

most used in aircraft design. British St<strong>and</strong>ard BS.8118 does not cover<br />

the fail-safe method, <strong>and</strong> it is beyond the scope of this book.<br />

Fatigue testing (3) should be employed when it is impossible to apply<br />

method (1), due to problems in verifying a design by calculation alone.<br />

Copyright 1999 by Taylor & Francis Group. All Rights Reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!