17.11.2012 Views

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 11.9 Variation of a with � (equation (11.16)).<br />

salient values being:<br />

�=90° �=1.00<br />

60° 0.82<br />

45° 0.71<br />

30° 0.63<br />

0 0.58.<br />

Appropriate values for certain cases of weld metal failure are therefore:<br />

Transverse in-line butt (�=90°) �=1.00<br />

Transverse fillet lap-joint (�=45°) �=0.71<br />

Any case of longitudinal loading (�=0) �=0.58<br />

‘Butt-fillet’ welds (Figure 11.7(d)) cause difficulty, because it is not<br />

clear which value to take for k. When the preparation has been specified,<br />

but the width of the deposit is uncertain, a safe procedure is to take<br />

k=1.0 <strong>and</strong> g=g 1 (Figure 11.7(d)). Alternatively, if the size of the deposit<br />

is clearly specified, it is acceptable to take k=0.85 <strong>and</strong> g=g 2 should this<br />

prove more favourable.<br />

11.3.5 Calculated resistance, fusion-boundary failure<br />

At any weld there are two fusion-boundary planes, both of which may<br />

need to be considered. The calculated resistance P¯c per unit length of<br />

weld is found from:<br />

P – c =ahpf (11.17)<br />

where pf =limiting stress for fusion-boundary failure, h=width of failure<br />

plane, <strong>and</strong> �=factor depending on joint geometry (as before).<br />

The limiting stress pf is governed by the properties of the parent<br />

metal. For heat-treated material it is given by:<br />

p f =k z1 p a<br />

Copyright 1999 by Taylor & Francis Group. All Rights Reserved.<br />

(11.18a)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!