17.11.2012 Views

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 8.20 Lateral-torsional buckling: (a) buckling occurs in a single bay over the whole<br />

length (L) of the beam, no lateral support being provided by the load; (b) buckling<br />

occurs in one of the bays (L 1 or L 2 ) between points of lateral support. S=lateral support.<br />

the minor axis (‘side moment’), the combined effect of the two<br />

components should be allowed for by using the interaction equation<br />

given in Section 8.7.9<br />

If effective lateral support is provided only at the end reaction points,<br />

with the compression flange otherwise free to deflect sideways, buckling<br />

is investigated by treating the whole span as a single unit or bay (Figure<br />

8.20 (a)). Alternatively if one or more lateral supports are provided<br />

along the length of the span, then the stability of each bay between<br />

such points of support must be checked (Figure 8.20(b)). In this case,<br />

the designer should also establish that these points really do provide<br />

lateral support to the compression flange, if necessary by employing a<br />

properly designed plan-view bracing system. The checking procedure<br />

we give is broadly based on BS.8118.<br />

8.7.2 Basic check<br />

In order to check against possible failure by LT buckling, it is necessary<br />

to ensure that the following requirement is met in every bay between<br />

points of effective lateral support:<br />

(8.30)<br />

where: M – =equivalent uniform moment in the bay considered,<br />

S=plastic modulus of gross section about major principal axis,<br />

p b =LT buckling stress (Section 8.7.4),<br />

� m =material factor (Section 5.1.3).<br />

8.7.3 Equivalent uniform moment<br />

M – is the magnitude of an assumed uniform moment that would have<br />

the same effect, in terms of buckling, as the actual pattern of moment<br />

on the bay considered. In a preliminary check, the designer can<br />

conservatively take M – equal to the greatest moment arising in the bay.<br />

For a more accurate value, it is necessary to consider the shape of the<br />

Copyright 1999 by Taylor & Francis Group. All Rights Reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!