17.11.2012 Views

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

Aluminium Design and Construction John Dwight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 11.19 (a) Peaking of the stress at the ends of a conventional bonded lap-joint, (b), (c)<br />

Methods for making the shear stress more even.<br />

stress pattern increases with the rigidity of the adhesive layer. Therefore,<br />

although increasing t g above the optimum value decreases the actual<br />

intrinsic strength of the adhesive, this will partly be offset by the attainment<br />

of a less peaky stress pattern, having a more favourable value for the<br />

ratio q 1 /q. The need for strict control of glue-line thickness thus tends to<br />

be less critical than might at first appear.<br />

Figure 11.19(c) shows another method of reducing the peakiness, as<br />

used by the British aluminium designer Ron Cobden. The metal is cut<br />

back at each edge of the bonded area, as shown, thereby increasing the<br />

thickness of the adhesive <strong>and</strong> making it more flexible in shear (at the<br />

critical points). This device <strong>and</strong> also the tapering method are easy to<br />

incorporate with extrusions.<br />

(b) Limiting stress (pv )<br />

An appropriate value to take for the limiting shear stress pv for the<br />

adhesive depends on many factors <strong>and</strong> is difficult to arrive at. One<br />

possibility is simply to accept the value t provided by the maker, based<br />

on the st<strong>and</strong>ard lap test. This is often a reasonable approach. Admittedly,<br />

the maker’s listed value is only typical <strong>and</strong> not a guaranteed minimum.<br />

But against this, the st<strong>and</strong>ard test is clearly pessimistic <strong>and</strong> produces a<br />

strength value for the adhesive well below its intrinsic value. The second<br />

effect can be expected to more than compensate for the first, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

value thus obtained for pv will probably be a safe one. Alternatively, for<br />

a more sophisticated assessment, the designer might call for special<br />

tests to be conducted to obtain the real intrinsic strength of the adhesive,<br />

using one of the specimen types in Figure 11.14.<br />

Whatever the method used, it is obviously essential to allow for<br />

possible factors arising in service that might degrade the strength of<br />

the adhesive, such as: (a) operation at elevated temperature; (b) immersion<br />

in water; <strong>and</strong> (c) sustained loading (creep).<br />

(c) Load factor<br />

British St<strong>and</strong>ard BS.8118 takes � m =3 for bonded joints, this being the<br />

value called for when a joint is validated by testing. This relatively<br />

Copyright 1999 by Taylor & Francis Group. All Rights Reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!