18.11.2012 Views

Cranfield University

Cranfield University

Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

List of Figures and Tables<br />

Figure 33: Soil displacement for different undercarriage systems................................. 43<br />

Figure 34: Group of wheel type soil displacement......................................................... 44<br />

Figure 35: Group of track type soil displacement .......................................................... 44<br />

Figure 36: Penetrometer resistance vs. depth for the Claas unit at three belt pressures. 49<br />

Figure 37: Soil displacement vs. depth for the Claas unit at three belt pressures .......... 50<br />

Figure 38: Pressure trace in soil below different belt pressures of Claas unit ............... 50<br />

Figure 39: Pressure summary for different belt tensions ............................................... 51<br />

Figure 40: Track units; TerraTrac, Westtrack, SPT, and Stocks.................................... 52<br />

Figure 41: Penetrometer resistance vs. depth for different track units........................... 53<br />

Figure 42: Soil displacement vs. depth for different track units .................................... 54<br />

Figure 43: Pressure profiles for track units including a 800/10.5/2.5 for reference....... 55<br />

Figure 44: Rectangularity for different track units......................................................... 56<br />

Figure 45: Pressure summary for different track units................................................... 56<br />

Figure 46: Soil displacement vs. depth for implement tyres and the track at 12 t ......... 58<br />

Figure 47: Soil displacement vs. depth for 900/5/0.5..................................................... 59<br />

Figure 48: Soil displacement vs. depth on clay soil for individual treatments .............. 62<br />

Figure 49: Soil displacement and regression lines for clay with individual groups....... 63<br />

Figure 50: Soil displacement and regression lines for clay with pooled groups............ 64<br />

Figure 51: Soil displacement and regression lines for sandy loam subsoiled ................ 65<br />

Figure 52: Soil displacement and regression lines for sandy loam shallow tilled ......... 66<br />

Figure 53: Penetrometer resistance for the controls on the clay side............................. 68<br />

Figure 54: Penetrometer resistance for clay control and the passage............................. 69<br />

Figure 55: Penetrometer resistance for the controls on the sandy loam shallow tilled .. 70<br />

Figure 56: Penetrometer resistance for sandy loam control and the passage................. 70<br />

Figure 57: Penetrometer resistance for the controls and the passage............................. 71<br />

Figure 58: Penetrometer resistance for control and the passage .................................... 71<br />

Figure 59: Penetrometer resistance diagram after a tracked and a wheeled machine .... 72<br />

Figure 60: Rut depths on sandy loam soil ...................................................................... 73<br />

Figure 61: Ruts depths on sandy loam soil from further above ..................................... 73<br />

Figure 62: Gamma ray dry bulk density......................................................................... 79<br />

Figure 63: Draught force vs. depth for a subsoiler tine.................................................. 84<br />

Figure 64: Draught force for subsoiling on the clay soil................................................ 88<br />

Figure 65: Draught force for subsoiling on the sandy soil ............................................. 88<br />

Figure 66: Estimated pressure from O’Sullivan et al. (1998) vs. contact pressure...... 100<br />

Ph.D. Thesis Dirk Ansorge (2007)<br />

X

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!