Cranfield University
Cranfield University
Cranfield University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Appendix<br />
Soil water content 15 % and initial dry bulk density 1.2 g/cm 3<br />
Setting soil water content to 15 % and reducing soil density to 1.2 g/cm 3 gave an average<br />
difference between the track and the tyres of 1.2 %. The resulting increase in soil density is<br />
nearly uniform with depth for the track, whereas for all others the increase decreases with<br />
depth. Interestingly the track is now the worst at the 3 rd layer from the bottom. Close to the<br />
surface all are similar and surface displacement is about 100 mm .<br />
The average difference between the track and the wheel was about 1 % for the increase in<br />
DBD. Surface rut depth was between 4 to 7 mm deeper for the wheels than for the track. No<br />
trend can be recognized for the different treatments at different initial DBD and/or soil water<br />
content. The same is true for varying DBD with respect to the depth from which all treatments<br />
cause the same soil displacement. However, these depths become shallower with an increase<br />
in soil water content.<br />
From a soil mechanics point of view the model supports the hypothesis that soil displacement,<br />
e.g. increase in soil density at the surface is determined by contact pressure whereas at depth<br />
it is determined by the overall load. This cannot be confirmed when looking at the results of<br />
Ansorge (2005). Here the tracks caused less displacement and therefore less increase in soil<br />
density over the entire depth range.<br />
With a reduction in initial soil strength, i.e. an increase in soil water content or a decrease in<br />
initial DBD soil compaction increases. This is in agreement with all findings in literature. For<br />
an initial DBD of 1.27 g/cm 3 the increase in DBD comes into the range measured by Ansorge<br />
(2005). The same is true with an increase in moisture content to 20 %. This puts emphasis on<br />
the fact that the slope and intercept of the virgin compression line should be changed as the<br />
original soil for which the model was designed for must have been stronger than the one used<br />
in the soil bin.<br />
Comparison of prediction behaviour of COMPSOIL for a range of VCL slopes and intercepts<br />
The model SOIL FLEX provides the ability to change critical soil mechanics parameters<br />
embedded in COMPSOIL directly while keeping both initial DBD and soil moisture content<br />
as given in the experiment. From theory an increasing slope of the virgin compression line<br />
means that increases in DBD result from smaller pressure changes. With a decreasing slope<br />
Ph.D. Thesis Dirk Ansorge (2007)<br />
200