18.11.2012 Views

Cranfield University

Cranfield University

Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix<br />

Soil water content 15 % and initial dry bulk density 1.2 g/cm 3<br />

Setting soil water content to 15 % and reducing soil density to 1.2 g/cm 3 gave an average<br />

difference between the track and the tyres of 1.2 %. The resulting increase in soil density is<br />

nearly uniform with depth for the track, whereas for all others the increase decreases with<br />

depth. Interestingly the track is now the worst at the 3 rd layer from the bottom. Close to the<br />

surface all are similar and surface displacement is about 100 mm .<br />

The average difference between the track and the wheel was about 1 % for the increase in<br />

DBD. Surface rut depth was between 4 to 7 mm deeper for the wheels than for the track. No<br />

trend can be recognized for the different treatments at different initial DBD and/or soil water<br />

content. The same is true for varying DBD with respect to the depth from which all treatments<br />

cause the same soil displacement. However, these depths become shallower with an increase<br />

in soil water content.<br />

From a soil mechanics point of view the model supports the hypothesis that soil displacement,<br />

e.g. increase in soil density at the surface is determined by contact pressure whereas at depth<br />

it is determined by the overall load. This cannot be confirmed when looking at the results of<br />

Ansorge (2005). Here the tracks caused less displacement and therefore less increase in soil<br />

density over the entire depth range.<br />

With a reduction in initial soil strength, i.e. an increase in soil water content or a decrease in<br />

initial DBD soil compaction increases. This is in agreement with all findings in literature. For<br />

an initial DBD of 1.27 g/cm 3 the increase in DBD comes into the range measured by Ansorge<br />

(2005). The same is true with an increase in moisture content to 20 %. This puts emphasis on<br />

the fact that the slope and intercept of the virgin compression line should be changed as the<br />

original soil for which the model was designed for must have been stronger than the one used<br />

in the soil bin.<br />

Comparison of prediction behaviour of COMPSOIL for a range of VCL slopes and intercepts<br />

The model SOIL FLEX provides the ability to change critical soil mechanics parameters<br />

embedded in COMPSOIL directly while keeping both initial DBD and soil moisture content<br />

as given in the experiment. From theory an increasing slope of the virgin compression line<br />

means that increases in DBD result from smaller pressure changes. With a decreasing slope<br />

Ph.D. Thesis Dirk Ansorge (2007)<br />

200

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!