18.11.2012 Views

Cranfield University

Cranfield University

Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix<br />

impact at the surface was ignored due to settlement as explained later. For the maximum<br />

working depth of 350 mm a uniform DBD of 1.49 g/cm 3 was assumed. Below 350 mm it was<br />

similar to before with 1.6 g/cm 3 to 750 mm.<br />

Starting with the sandy loam which received the shallow disc tine cultivation an offset of 15<br />

mm was taken out similar to the clay as both soils received the same cultivation. As obvious<br />

from Figure 19 predicted soil displacement is larger for a concentration factor of 5 compared<br />

to a concentration factor of 4. The influence of the actual pressure calculation when soil<br />

displacement is calculated in the model is marginal, however, the influence of the<br />

concentration factor on the slope and intercept of the VCL causes this difference. Overall a<br />

concentration factor of 4 fits better, however, using the VCL created in the soil bin on the<br />

same soil type with a concentration factor of 5 fits the data best. This is due to the fact that the<br />

VCL from the soil bin contains more data points. The field experiment was conducted at a<br />

moisture content of approximately 20 % whereby the soil bin experiment was conducted at<br />

about 9 %. The good agreement in predicted soil displacement using the soil bin VCL is due<br />

to a similar distance from optimum moisture content for compaction which is at about 15 %<br />

moisture content for a sandy loam soil. Taking the three different VCLs into consideration<br />

which were used to predict soil displacement and created from tyre passes only on shallow<br />

tilled soil, only subsoiled soil and the pooled one, shows the best agreement for the VCL<br />

prediction gained from the shallow tilled plot only. Using the one gained from the subsoiled<br />

plot estimates soil displacement higher and the pooled one (called “both”) predicts<br />

intermediate soil displacement. The three different VCLs are shown in Figure 20.<br />

Predicted vs. measured data for the sandy loam soil subsoiled is shown in Figure 21. A<br />

concentration factor of 4 fits the data for the normal inflation pressure better than a<br />

concentration factor of 5. However, at high inflation pressure a concentration factor of 5<br />

seems more appropriate because it overcomes the under estimated soil displacement for this<br />

passage. Thus on this soil condition no clear recommendation can be given concerning the<br />

concentration factor. Similar to the shallow tilled part the VCL gained from the soil bin gives<br />

the best estimation of soil displacement. Interesting to note is the relation between the<br />

estimation gained from the pooled data (“both”) and the one only utilizing the data gained on<br />

the subsoiled plot (“subsoil”). At a concentration factor of 5, the prediction for “both” is<br />

bigger than for “subsoil” at normal and high inflation pressure. Nevertheless at a<br />

Ph.D. Thesis Dirk Ansorge (2007)<br />

217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!