18.11.2012 Views

Cranfield University

Cranfield University

Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendix<br />

Rel. Density<br />

3<br />

2,5<br />

2<br />

1,5<br />

1<br />

0,5<br />

0<br />

y = -0,2432Ln(x) + 2,6726<br />

R 2 =0,8698<br />

y =-0,123Ln(x) +2,4221<br />

R 2 =1<br />

10 100 1000<br />

Pressure (kPa)<br />

Figure 7: Virgin compression line for sandy loam soils ■ from O’Sullivan et al.<br />

(1998) and ♦ from the soil bin studies based on the average density increases<br />

from Ansorge and Godwin (2007)<br />

To validate the heuristically chosen � = 5 the 900/10.5/1.9 experiment was evaluated for a<br />

smaller � of 4, representing a denser soil. P for � = 4 was calculated using the dependencies<br />

of � 2 and � 3 on � 1 from Table 6. The slope (-0.2432) of the resulting VCL is identical to<br />

the slope for � =5. The intercept of 2.6929 is larger than the one which was derived from � =5<br />

(2.6726). The overall effect of changing � is evaluated in Figure 9 whereby the prediction of<br />

the 900/10.5/1.9 for � = 4 is compared to both the measured data and the predictions for<br />

� =5. The smaller � results in a larger deviation of the rut depth at the surface and only a<br />

close agreement between measured and predicted data below 400 mm compared to the<br />

measured soil displacement. The smaller rut depth for � = 4 is followed by a larger decrease<br />

in soil displacement within the top 250 mm resulting in a smaller soil displacement over the<br />

entire depth of the soil profile. Transferring the observations from Figure 9 for the<br />

900/10.5/1.9 back to the other treatments, shown in Figure 8, results in a general reduction in<br />

predicted soil displacement which consequently reduces the overall close agreement shown<br />

Figure 10. Therefore the selection of � =5 is justified as this shows overall a closer<br />

agreement.<br />

Fitting linear regression functions through the top 500 mm of the measured and predicted data<br />

of Figure 8 estimating the average increase in soil density as described by Ansorge and<br />

Godwin (2007a) and plotting the measured against predicted average density increase results<br />

in close agreement as shown in Figure 10 to within +/- 2 % errors. The data is spread<br />

uniformly around the line of slope 1 and does not exhibit a general offset confirming the<br />

Ph.D. Thesis Dirk Ansorge (2007)<br />

207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!