18.11.2012 Views

Cranfield University

Cranfield University

Cranfield University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Experimental Methods<br />

had been mounted on the front axle and 600/55-26.5 tyres on the rear axle. The front and<br />

rear tyres were inflated to 2.5 and 1.4 bar, respectively.<br />

Figure 4: The combine harvesters taken into the field<br />

For the field trials both machines were equipped with a 9 m header and the traveling speed<br />

of the machines was approximately 1 m/s, thus similar to soil bin speed. This slow speed<br />

(in comparison to real working conditions) was necessary to target the measurement spots.<br />

The aim was to make a relative comparison, not necessarily replicating exact harvest<br />

speeds, and hence the speed itself is not significant on the relative difference as long as<br />

both machines operate at the same speed. However, the speed in exact harvest conditions<br />

could influence the outcome eventually.<br />

2.1.2.3 Experimental Set Up<br />

The initially planned treatments with numbers one to five (locations shown in Figure 5 and<br />

Figure 6) were the tracked combine harvester with full (1) and empty grain tank (3), a<br />

wheeled combine harvester with full (2) and empty grain tank (4) at recommended infla-<br />

tion pressure for maximum machine weight and the wheeled combine harvester at +1 bar<br />

on top of the recommended inflation pressure (5). This additional inflation pressure of 1<br />

bar was selected because of theoretical ideas leading to an infield possibility to gain the<br />

slope and intercept of the virgin compression line for the given soil type and conditions.<br />

Ph.D. Thesis Dirk Ansorge (2007)<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!