20.11.2012 Views

Contents Telektronikk - Telenor

Contents Telektronikk - Telenor

Contents Telektronikk - Telenor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- service/source coding<br />

- interleaving<br />

- physical level encryption<br />

- channel coding<br />

- burst building/formatting (duplexing<br />

scheme)<br />

- modulation<br />

- multiplexing<br />

- power control.<br />

Most of these mechanisms must be harmonised<br />

both in the transmitter and the<br />

receiver side of the air interface. When<br />

examining the capabilities of these mechanisms<br />

in combination, the overall system<br />

performance and the performance as<br />

seen from each user should be considered,<br />

as will be returned to in Section 4.1.<br />

In addition, a number of other features<br />

can be identified, like the equalisation<br />

and the diversity scheme.<br />

Error control techniques can be classified<br />

as forward error control or automatic<br />

repeat request. Some performance measures<br />

relevant for error control are the<br />

throughput (and goodput), integrity, and<br />

delay. In this context, goodput is the rate<br />

of error free information (user level) that<br />

is transferred. Naturally, automatic repeat<br />

request may introduce long delays, especially<br />

when the radio signal conditions<br />

are poor. This fact can be compared with<br />

the more constant delay that forward<br />

error control will introduce. Another<br />

aspect is that the automatic repeat request<br />

is more likely to keep the error control<br />

within a given limit. These capabilities<br />

make the different error control techniques<br />

suitable for various services, like<br />

automatic repeat request for data services<br />

and forward error control for services<br />

having real time requirements.<br />

Returning to the portion specific for<br />

mobile systems (the radio interface), several<br />

channels are usually defined, as<br />

depicted in Figure 5. Several of these<br />

channel types have different usage patterns<br />

and ways of control. Some are oneway<br />

in the sense that the information<br />

flows either to or from the base station,<br />

e.g. like the broadcast control channel<br />

usually carrying information from the<br />

base station to the mobile stations. The<br />

structure of these channels has so far<br />

been fixed during the system specification<br />

phase.<br />

Various performance characteristics can<br />

be relevant for the different channels. For<br />

instance, when one entity (e.g. the base<br />

station) controls the information transmission,<br />

the maximum transfer rate and<br />

delay could be of most interest. When<br />

several entities access the channel, stability<br />

considerations should be included as<br />

well.<br />

One observation from the preceding discussion<br />

is that the different mechanisms<br />

should be dynamically adjusted for the<br />

various services and the environments,<br />

see e.g. [1], [4]. Utilising such a flexibility<br />

will support the introduction of<br />

TGMS into the application areas as the<br />

need for an overall trade-off between the<br />

various mechanisms could be alleviated.<br />

However, the complexity will increase,<br />

implying a change of the cost, which<br />

then invites for the definition of other<br />

trade-off problems as well.<br />

3.3 Mobility procedures<br />

In addition to the usual call handling procedures<br />

(call set-up, call release, authentication,<br />

supplementary services, etc.), a<br />

number of more or less mobile specific<br />

procedures can be defined. Such procedures<br />

mostly result from the fact that the<br />

users are moving. They include:<br />

- handover (switching an established<br />

connection between channels in different<br />

base stations or within a base station)<br />

- location update (performed when a<br />

user/terminal is crossing a location<br />

area boundary, which can be defined<br />

by a set of base station coverage areas)<br />

- paging (searching for a mobile)<br />

- registration/deregistration (linking/delinking<br />

a user to/from a certain terminal)<br />

- attachment/detachment (informing the<br />

network of a terminal/user status, e.g.<br />

power on/off for a mobile terminal).<br />

A number of trade-off problems (optimisation<br />

problem formulations) can be<br />

identified, several related to the division<br />

of the coverage area and the decisions of<br />

which criteria to use for initiating the relevant<br />

procedures.<br />

A location area can be defined as the area<br />

within which a mobile station can roam<br />

without informing the fixed network<br />

about its whereabouts. Entering a new<br />

location area, the mobile station sends a<br />

location update (registration) to the network.<br />

When a call for a mobile station<br />

arrives, the network has to search for<br />

(named paging) the mobile station in the<br />

location area where it was last registered.<br />

Traffic<br />

channels<br />

Control<br />

channels<br />

Common<br />

control<br />

channels<br />

User<br />

specific<br />

channels<br />

Dedicated<br />

control channel<br />

Figure 5 Categories of some possible channels in a<br />

mobile communications system<br />

In a network with cell sizes of the same<br />

range and without overlap, minimising<br />

the location update traffic requests large<br />

location areas, while minimising the paging<br />

traffic requests small location areas.<br />

By a suitable weighing between location<br />

updates and paging messages, this can be<br />

formulated as an optimisation problem,<br />

see e.g. [12]. Such problems are expected<br />

to become more complex in multi-layer<br />

cellular networks.<br />

The shape and the location of a cell may<br />

have a major impact on the handover<br />

traffic, e.g. as shown in [10]. This effect<br />

is more pronounced for smaller cells<br />

where the distinct paths (routes for<br />

mobile stations), their orientation and<br />

traffic flows become important. For a<br />

larger cell the approximation that the<br />

moving directions of the mobile stations<br />

are uniformly distributed over (0,2π)<br />

could be more justified. Some possible<br />

distributions for the dwelling times in<br />

cells are studied in [6]. Under suitable<br />

approximations (ned total call duration,<br />

random change of direction within a cell,<br />

etc.), it was found that a ned cell<br />

dwelling time can be assumed. As also<br />

pointed out, it is doubtful whether this<br />

result is valid for smaller cells. Then, any<br />

regularity in the mobile stations’ activity<br />

patterns should be considered.<br />

The influence from the cell geometry on<br />

the handover rates together with the<br />

grouping of cells and the location update<br />

rates can also be studied. The routes followed<br />

by the mobile stations could be<br />

taken into account when planning the<br />

base stations’ coverage areas. Another<br />

point is to introduce hystereses for the<br />

decisions when a handover should be initiated<br />

in order to avoid multiple hand-<br />

Broadcast<br />

control<br />

channel<br />

Paging<br />

channel<br />

Set-up<br />

control<br />

channel<br />

User<br />

packet<br />

channel<br />

Slow associated<br />

control channel<br />

Fast associated<br />

control channel<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!