Contents Telektronikk - Telenor
Contents Telektronikk - Telenor
Contents Telektronikk - Telenor
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Registered number of calls<br />
Registered number of calls<br />
126<br />
900<br />
800<br />
700<br />
600<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100<br />
0<br />
300<br />
280<br />
260<br />
240<br />
220<br />
200<br />
180<br />
160<br />
140<br />
120<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23>24<br />
Minutes<br />
Figure 8 Call holding times, Period 1, Interval 2<br />
Number of observations: 8433 Mean: 4.93 mins<br />
Standard deviation: 15.04 mins Maximum holding time: 600.0 mins<br />
0<br />
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23>24<br />
Minutes<br />
Figure 9 Call holding times, Period 1, Interval 3<br />
Number of observations: 2799 Mean: 4.49 mins<br />
Standard deviation: 14.11 mins Maximum holding time: 518.9 mins<br />
holding time of 600 min. – see footnote<br />
after Table 7) contributes to 13 % increase<br />
in the coefficient of variation and<br />
4 % increase in the mean alone.<br />
However, the results still indicate clearly<br />
that standard deviation is larger than<br />
mean in nearly every category, which<br />
confirms that the distributions of holding<br />
times do not follow negative exponential<br />
distributions.<br />
Table 7 also shows that in contrast to<br />
Interval 1, the mean holding time had<br />
been reduced by 4.7 % from Period 1 to<br />
Period 2 (from 4.93 min. down to 4.70<br />
min.).<br />
When comparing the results from Interval<br />
1 with that from Interval 2, we observed<br />
that both means and coefficients<br />
of variation are larger (in some cases<br />
considerably) outside the normal working<br />
hours than that during working hours.<br />
Another observation we made is that<br />
among the “normal” domestic calls (i.e.<br />
the categories of Local, Neighboring<br />
counties, and Long distance calls) the<br />
distance plays an important role – the<br />
longer the distance is, the longer is mean<br />
call holding time. We believe that the<br />
reason for this is that users appear to pay<br />
more attention to the price when they<br />
make more expensive calls, so they<br />
choose to make long calls when the price<br />
is lower.<br />
3.5.3 Interval 3: Weekends<br />
In Interval 3 both the call intensity and<br />
the number of calls are lower than that in<br />
Interval 2.<br />
The distribution of call holding times for<br />
all outgoing calls (Interval 3, Period 1) is<br />
shown in Figure 9.<br />
Figure 9 looks similar to that of Figure 8<br />
(Interval 2). The mean holding time is<br />
much longer than that in Interval 1, but a<br />
bit shorter than that in Interval 2.<br />
Table 8 shows the number of observations,<br />
mean holding times, standard deviations,<br />
coefficients of variation, and maximum<br />
holding times for all successful<br />
outgoing calls and for each category, for<br />
both observation periods.<br />
3.5.4 Comparisons and discussions<br />
The registered holding times show that<br />
the mean holding time for all calls is considerably<br />
longer outside normal working<br />
hours. The most significant differences<br />
appear on longer distance calls (calls to<br />
neighbouring counties, long distance calls