20.11.2012 Views

Contents Telektronikk - Telenor

Contents Telektronikk - Telenor

Contents Telektronikk - Telenor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Registered number of calls<br />

Registered number of calls<br />

126<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

300<br />

280<br />

260<br />

240<br />

220<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23>24<br />

Minutes<br />

Figure 8 Call holding times, Period 1, Interval 2<br />

Number of observations: 8433 Mean: 4.93 mins<br />

Standard deviation: 15.04 mins Maximum holding time: 600.0 mins<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23>24<br />

Minutes<br />

Figure 9 Call holding times, Period 1, Interval 3<br />

Number of observations: 2799 Mean: 4.49 mins<br />

Standard deviation: 14.11 mins Maximum holding time: 518.9 mins<br />

holding time of 600 min. – see footnote<br />

after Table 7) contributes to 13 % increase<br />

in the coefficient of variation and<br />

4 % increase in the mean alone.<br />

However, the results still indicate clearly<br />

that standard deviation is larger than<br />

mean in nearly every category, which<br />

confirms that the distributions of holding<br />

times do not follow negative exponential<br />

distributions.<br />

Table 7 also shows that in contrast to<br />

Interval 1, the mean holding time had<br />

been reduced by 4.7 % from Period 1 to<br />

Period 2 (from 4.93 min. down to 4.70<br />

min.).<br />

When comparing the results from Interval<br />

1 with that from Interval 2, we observed<br />

that both means and coefficients<br />

of variation are larger (in some cases<br />

considerably) outside the normal working<br />

hours than that during working hours.<br />

Another observation we made is that<br />

among the “normal” domestic calls (i.e.<br />

the categories of Local, Neighboring<br />

counties, and Long distance calls) the<br />

distance plays an important role – the<br />

longer the distance is, the longer is mean<br />

call holding time. We believe that the<br />

reason for this is that users appear to pay<br />

more attention to the price when they<br />

make more expensive calls, so they<br />

choose to make long calls when the price<br />

is lower.<br />

3.5.3 Interval 3: Weekends<br />

In Interval 3 both the call intensity and<br />

the number of calls are lower than that in<br />

Interval 2.<br />

The distribution of call holding times for<br />

all outgoing calls (Interval 3, Period 1) is<br />

shown in Figure 9.<br />

Figure 9 looks similar to that of Figure 8<br />

(Interval 2). The mean holding time is<br />

much longer than that in Interval 1, but a<br />

bit shorter than that in Interval 2.<br />

Table 8 shows the number of observations,<br />

mean holding times, standard deviations,<br />

coefficients of variation, and maximum<br />

holding times for all successful<br />

outgoing calls and for each category, for<br />

both observation periods.<br />

3.5.4 Comparisons and discussions<br />

The registered holding times show that<br />

the mean holding time for all calls is considerably<br />

longer outside normal working<br />

hours. The most significant differences<br />

appear on longer distance calls (calls to<br />

neighbouring counties, long distance calls

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!