Contents Telektronikk - Telenor
Contents Telektronikk - Telenor
Contents Telektronikk - Telenor
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
146<br />
Preliminary studies indicate that traffic<br />
mixes where low capacity traffic competes<br />
with high capacity traffic, do not<br />
perform well. Either the connection<br />
blocking will be unacceptably high for<br />
the high capacity traffic or the link utilisation<br />
will be unacceptably low. Routing<br />
methods alone do not repair this, and we<br />
have to use service protection methods<br />
for best network utilisation with given<br />
grade of service constraints. Also in these<br />
cases the computational effort is small<br />
when dimensioning according to an<br />
equivalent bandwidth allocation model.<br />
When the offered traffic grows, it may be<br />
a good idea to separate the traffic in<br />
classes with dedicated capacity pools in<br />
the trunk group for each class and perhaps<br />
a capacity pool for common overflow.<br />
- Traffic with capacity demands of 5 –<br />
10 % of the link capacity and more<br />
may be treated separately, perhaps on a<br />
reservation basis.<br />
- It may be that we should also divide<br />
the rest of the traffic in two classes, i.e.<br />
traffic with capacity demands lower<br />
than for instance 0.5 % of the link<br />
capacity in one class, though this<br />
depends on the traffic volume and the<br />
traffic mix.<br />
The provision of quality of service<br />
classes, best effort services, variable bit<br />
rate services with more complicated (non<br />
linear) allocation schemes and various<br />
ways of bundling virtual channel connections<br />
into virtual path connections, will<br />
complicate the dimensioning task. This is<br />
a challenge for future research activities.<br />
References<br />
1 Aein, J M. A multi-user-class, blocked-calls-cleared,<br />
demand access<br />
model. IEEE transaction on communications,<br />
Com 26, 3, 1978.<br />
2 Delbrouck, L E N. On the steadystate<br />
distribution in a service facility<br />
carrying mixtures of traffic with different<br />
peakedness factor and capacity<br />
requirements. IEEE transaction on<br />
communications, Com 31, 11, 1983.<br />
3 Fiche, G, Le Gall, P, Ricupero, S.<br />
Study of blocking for multislot connections<br />
in digital link systems. I:<br />
11th international teletraffic<br />
congress, ITC-11.<br />
4 Gehrst & Lee. Virtual-circuit load<br />
control in fast packet-switched<br />
broadband networks. Globecom<br />
1988.<br />
5 ITU-T Recommendation I.311. B-<br />
ISDN general network aspects.<br />
Geneva 1993.<br />
6 ITU-T Recommendation I.356. B-<br />
ISDN ATM layer cell transfer performance.<br />
Geneva 1994.<br />
7 Iversen, V B. A simple convolution<br />
algorithm for the exact evaluation of<br />
multi-service loss systems with heterogeneous<br />
traffic flows and access<br />
control. I: Proceedings of 7th Nordic<br />
teletraffic seminar, NTS-7. Lund,<br />
Sweden, 1987.<br />
8 Kaspher, A N. Bandwidth allocation<br />
and network dimensioning for international<br />
multiservice networks. I:<br />
Proceedings of 5th international teletraffic<br />
congress, ITC-5, Lake Como,<br />
1987.<br />
9 Kaufmann, J S. Blocking in a shared<br />
resource environment. IEEE transaction<br />
on communications, Com 29, 10,<br />
1981.<br />
10 Labourdette & Hart. Blocking probabilities<br />
in multitraffic loss systems:<br />
insensitivity, asymptotic behaviour<br />
and approximations. IEEE transactions<br />
on communications, 8, 1992.<br />
11 Lindberger, K. Some ideas on GOS<br />
and call scale link-by-link dimensioning.<br />
I: 10th Nordic teletraffic<br />
seminar, NTS-10, Århus 1992.<br />
12 Roberts, J. A service system with<br />
heterogeneous user requirements.<br />
Performance of data communications<br />
systems and their applications, North<br />
Holland, 1981.<br />
13 Roberts, J W. Teletraffic models for<br />
Telecom 1 integrated services network.<br />
I: 10th international teletraffic<br />
congress, ITC-10, Montreal 1983.