Contents Telektronikk - Telenor
Contents Telektronikk - Telenor
Contents Telektronikk - Telenor
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
204<br />
A(t)<br />
1<br />
x<br />
–<br />
A<br />
on<br />
off<br />
Ti Pji Pij Tj Below<br />
threshold<br />
Figure 9 The biasing strategy<br />
Cell loss<br />
C m<br />
Turning to importance sampling (IS)<br />
with optimal parameters this seams rather<br />
promising. However, although an optimal<br />
parameterisation exists in our simple<br />
system, this is generally not the case. In<br />
fact, if we make the same changes as<br />
above, we no longer have a known optimal<br />
parameterisation. Nevertheless, even<br />
without optimal parameters, IS will provoke<br />
rare events rather efficient, but must<br />
be handled with care.<br />
Using IS with biasing far from optimal,<br />
may produce very wrong estimates, see<br />
Figure 8 adopted from [41]. A practical<br />
approach to avoid the most drastic effect<br />
is reported in [37] where a number of<br />
experiments with different biasing<br />
parameters are run, and the optimal<br />
parameter is found as the one minimising<br />
the variance of the likelihood ratio. The<br />
results from the comparison study show a<br />
difference in gain of 5-10 between the<br />
reversed (optimal) and balanced strategy.<br />
The third method, RESTART is not as<br />
effective as optimal IS and TS when the<br />
l/m ratio is low because the intermediate<br />
point might be a rare event as well. The<br />
difference is less when the ratio become<br />
higher. The multi-level RESTART proposed<br />
in [18] is expected to improve this<br />
because several intermediate points will<br />
be used. However, the effect will probably<br />
be most viable where the number of<br />
states is large, such as N = 85.<br />
RESTART will also experience significant<br />
problems in the multi-dimensional<br />
state space, this time with defining the<br />
intermediate points, i.e. how to reduce<br />
the state space to make rare events less<br />
rare.<br />
T* i<br />
P ji *<br />
P ij *<br />
T* j<br />
Likelihood bound<br />
exceeded<br />
All three methods will experience problems<br />
in the multidimensional state space.<br />
In all methods the main reason is that we<br />
no longer have an easy way of determining<br />
the most likely paths (trajectories) in<br />
the state space that lead to our rare events<br />
of interest.<br />
It is finally worth noting that the three<br />
methods are not mutual exclusive. IS<br />
may easily be applied both in combination<br />
of RESTART and transition splitting.<br />
How to combine RESTART and<br />
transition splitting is not obvious. We<br />
have also gained experience by the use of<br />
importance sampling in combination<br />
with control variables in a proposed<br />
measurement technique for experiments<br />
or simulations. This method is described<br />
in the following section.<br />
6 Generator based<br />
importance sampling<br />
This section presents a generation and<br />
measurement technique as an example of<br />
practical application of some of the<br />
speed-up techniques from previous sections.<br />
An abstraction of the problem at<br />
hand is shown in Figure 10. The initial<br />
objectives was to define a technique that<br />
reduced the required measurement period<br />
significantly, gave stable and unbiased<br />
estimates of rare events like cell losses,<br />
and required no control over the internal<br />
state of the target system. The latter is of<br />
utmost importance when it comes to<br />
measurement on physical equipment.<br />
However, it is anticipated that it is possible<br />
to detect the first of one or more<br />
cell losses.<br />
The proposed technique that meet these<br />
objectives [33] will be outlined in this<br />
section. It is based on the Composite<br />
Source Model which is developed for<br />
load generation during controlled traffic<br />
measurements with realistic load scenarios<br />
[42]. Traffic generation according to<br />
this model has been successfully implemented<br />
in the Synthesized Traffic Generator<br />
(STG) [3]. The technique may therefore<br />
be implemented in the successors of<br />
the STG with moderate changes of the<br />
generation hardware to perform measurements<br />
on physical systems. It is currently<br />
implemented in the DELAB end-to-end<br />
traffic simulator [12].<br />
6.1 Approach<br />
The measurement technique consists<br />
mainly of three parts. Firstly, the rare<br />
event of interest must be provoked by<br />
pushing the system into a region where<br />
these are more likely to occur. Secondly,<br />
the entire measurement period must be<br />
defined and divided into independent<br />
parts to produce a large number of independent<br />
observations for the purpose of<br />
statistics. Finally, anchoring the observations<br />
and introduce variance reduction<br />
are possible by use of internal control<br />
variable that can be defined when cell<br />
loss is the rare event of interest. The simulation<br />
experiments are conducted in parallel<br />
on several workstation in network as<br />
described in Section 3.2.<br />
So far the work on measurement technique<br />
have been devoted to observation<br />
of cell losses [33,43] and the presentation<br />
in this section will therefore also use cell<br />
loss ratio as measurement objective.<br />
6.1.1 Importance sampling<br />
To push the system into a cell loss region<br />
we manipulate the load parameters and<br />
apply the importance sampling technique,<br />
see Section 5.3.2.<br />
Traffic<br />
generation<br />
Observation<br />
Target<br />
system<br />
Figure 10 Measurement scenario for<br />
application of importance sampling in<br />
ATM systems