11.07.2015 Views

Report on Exchanges - INSEAD CALT

Report on Exchanges - INSEAD CALT

Report on Exchanges - INSEAD CALT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bernard joins the Goodbridge camp and summarizes the opini<strong>on</strong>s. He suggests a simpleprocess (argue a bit, then vote) to reach c<strong>on</strong>sensus and calls for Uffe to share his view….De : imperial, bernard [mailto:bernard.imperial@CGG.com]Envoyé : mercredi 12 juin 2013 23:48Dear All,Hello from Paris!Below is my view.Provided there’s no spare time (and probably no means) to dig into Bauer situati<strong>on</strong> and see if theaccusati<strong>on</strong> against Bauer are developing, Gianluca should choose to go with Goodbridge, whileimmediately launching a plan to review the next seas<strong>on</strong> with a reduced budget and going back to SirRalph to present the budget trying to get more m<strong>on</strong>ey based <strong>on</strong> level of performance during the firstraces for instance. In additi<strong>on</strong> a plan to find an additi<strong>on</strong>al sp<strong>on</strong>sor during the seas<strong>on</strong> might belaunched (organizing special events <strong>on</strong> some races to attract sp<strong>on</strong>sors <strong>on</strong> the spot for <strong>on</strong>e race).We’ve now 4 out of 5 team members input (I added below Eds<strong>on</strong>’s answer received in cc:)One missing…But already differing views. We so need to define a way to reach a team c<strong>on</strong>sensus <strong>on</strong> our finaldecisi<strong>on</strong>. Could we argue a bit then vote?Waiting anyway for your input Uffe,Kind RegardsBernard…and here comes Uffe, who also prefers to sign with Sir Ralph….De : Uffe Halldorss<strong>on</strong> [mailto:UH@FLSMIDTH.COM]Envoyé : jeudi 13 juin 2013 09:37Dear all,Sorry for late reply.My first reacti<strong>on</strong> was that a decisi<strong>on</strong> could not be taken based <strong>on</strong> the available informati<strong>on</strong> - andwithout any risk evaluati<strong>on</strong> of the c<strong>on</strong>sequences of the decisi<strong>on</strong>. The decisi<strong>on</strong> could have a hugeimpact <strong>on</strong> the Eagleracings future. But I choose the sp<strong>on</strong>ser with the lowest risk and the bestbranding profile for the Eagleracing- Goodbridge - giving Eagleracing time to find additi<strong>on</strong>alsp<strong>on</strong>sors as mentin<strong>on</strong>ed. Dependency of <strong>on</strong>e main sp<strong>on</strong>sors sounds risky – especially if the valuesof the Sp<strong>on</strong>sor and the Racing Team are not align.If I should make a parallel to the real world we have in Denmark a professi<strong>on</strong>al bike cyclingcompany called Riis Cycling. The are now called Team Saxo Bank – Tinkoff. Every time they loosetheir main sp<strong>on</strong>sor they are fighting for survival. Now they have 2 main sp<strong>on</strong>sors - it looks likethey for period have mitigated the risk and have found a more sustainable soluti<strong>on</strong>.As I see it we are now 4 in favor for GoodBridge and 1 for Bauer….Best RegardsUffe Halldorss<strong>on</strong>Group Health and Safety ManagerAAA/<strong>INSEAD</strong>/062013 - 16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!