11.07.2015 Views

Report on Exchanges - INSEAD CALT

Report on Exchanges - INSEAD CALT

Report on Exchanges - INSEAD CALT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

- Does the c<strong>on</strong>tract with Eagle’s former main sp<strong>on</strong>sor allow for leaving <strong>on</strong> such a short noticewithout any penalties or restricti<strong>on</strong>s ?- Is Eagle struggling for la l<strong>on</strong>g time in order to find sp<strong>on</strong>sors? How is the supply side of thesp<strong>on</strong>soring currently doing ?- How many other sp<strong>on</strong>sors do Eagle have? Is it thinkable to ask them for a bail out?- Leveraging Goodbridge : which are this company’s main partners ? which are the company’s maincompetitors ?- Leveraging Bauer : same noti<strong>on</strong>s, partners, competitors?- Can Eagle buy some time for example by asking its sp<strong>on</strong>sors to fund the cash in advance ?- Isn’t it possible to get credit facilities ?- Did the Ep1 video imply that the commitment of Bauer was as clear/str<strong>on</strong>g as the <strong>on</strong>e picturedfor Goodbridge ?- Can we ask for some probabilities … ;-)- What is the civic, ethic sensitivity of the racing business in general ? And with Eagle’s othersp<strong>on</strong>sors (current and prospects) : to assess if the ethic issue is an actual issueBest regards… he agrees with Steven to share opini<strong>on</strong>s and c<strong>on</strong>tinues to reflect <strong>on</strong> the decisi<strong>on</strong> makingapproach and the possible c<strong>on</strong>sequences of signing the deal with Goodbridge…De : frederic.marijsse@ores.net [mailto:frederic.marijsse@ores.net]Envoyé : mardi 11 juin 2013 03:22Agreed.De : frederic.marijsse@ores.net [mailto:frederic.marijsse@ores.net]Envoyé : mardi 11 juin 2013 04:28Let me come back to the process:How are we going to organise the debate part ?Does somebody have similar experience of written debate/decisi<strong>on</strong> making ? (I have some ideas but..)How should we organize de “””voting”””” of the proposed alternative/decisi<strong>on</strong> ?Voting a moti<strong>on</strong> without sufficient c<strong>on</strong>tradictory debate will prove inefficient…indeed the ash videoillustrate the herd syndrome…On the other hand we could all agree to go wr<strong>on</strong>g ;-) after all S<strong>on</strong>y did manage not to go for “iPod like”while having de walkman, IBM with pc..etcMore seriously, what are de decisi<strong>on</strong> alternatives that should be weighed ?AAA/<strong>INSEAD</strong>/062013 - 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!