…now Frederic shares his reflecti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the decisi<strong>on</strong> making process to agree <strong>on</strong> as a team.He suggests different approaches and ideas and calls for feedback…De : frederic.marijsse@ores.net [mailto:frederic.marijsse@ores.net]Envoyé : lundi 10 juin 2013 11:24Hello every<strong>on</strong>e,You’d probably agree with my saying that a decisi<strong>on</strong> making process involving discussi<strong>on</strong> andinteracti<strong>on</strong>s can already become difficult when in face to face and between people who know eachother and sharing the same “values/corporate culture”…Not <strong>on</strong>ly didn’t we get a chance to get to know each other, there is also a good potential formisunderstanding given the communicati<strong>on</strong> means we are about to use.Albeit we are asked to do so while having some kind of fun, hopefully ;-)Given all that, may I suggest we agree <strong>on</strong> a communicati<strong>on</strong> process and a schedule, in order to discussand propose a sound alternative, or a decisi<strong>on</strong> to Gianluca ?What do you think if we share per E-mail our understanding of the situati<strong>on</strong> and the suggesti<strong>on</strong>s madefor Episode One ?Shouldn’t we agree to make a short summary of each <strong>on</strong>e of the positi<strong>on</strong>s sent last week ? and work <strong>on</strong>that basis ?Is there some<strong>on</strong>e tempted by the task ? ;-)Shouldn’t we agree to use a simple tool to call for the facts and measure the trade off between risk andopportunity ? Any suggesti<strong>on</strong>s ?Are we allowed to call for a skype- meeting, in the late evening when the kids and the bosses areasleep (at last..) ? Or more, let say <strong>on</strong>e to get to know each other and agree <strong>on</strong> the process and a sec<strong>on</strong>dto actually get to the “decisi<strong>on</strong>”If E-mail is mandatory, we should agree <strong>on</strong> a process to avoid E-mail traffic c<strong>on</strong>gesti<strong>on</strong>s andchaos..although we all know by experience that it doesn’t happen in our ever day life ..Other communicati<strong>on</strong>s ?If some<strong>on</strong>e knows a better soluti<strong>on</strong>/process, please share with me.Best regardsFred.… he also thanks Rose and agrees to complete the criteria table. In additi<strong>on</strong> he suggestsasking questi<strong>on</strong>s to get a better understanding of the dilemma situati<strong>on</strong> and shares hisindividual resp<strong>on</strong>se in favor of Goodbridge…De : frederic.marijsse@ores.net [mailto:frederic.marijsse@ores.net]Envoyé : lundi 10 juin 2013 17:53Thank you for your proposal,Decisi<strong>on</strong> criteria are indeed of great importance before.. and after.. ;-) I couldn’t agree moreAAA/<strong>INSEAD</strong>/062013 - 30
The practical organizati<strong>on</strong> of our work should still be addressed, d<strong>on</strong>’t you think ?When it comes to the heart of the subject, I will try to use your template .Furthermore, shouldn’t we think of some questi<strong>on</strong>s that could be asked to the professor in order toc<strong>on</strong>firm or precise our understanding of the situati<strong>on</strong> and the range of possibilities ? Should it be strictlyforbidden, we should then state precisely all hypothesis underlying our understanding and decisi<strong>on</strong>proposalFor instance, I ‘m not sure the commitment of Bauer is as c<strong>on</strong>crete as it seems, it can be though, but inmy opini<strong>on</strong>, the descriptive part of the video fell a bit short tot that respect, d<strong>on</strong>’t you agree ?I will complete your template with my understandingTo make sure and give some c<strong>on</strong>text, please find here-after my reply for Ep1. Ok maybe a bit ofst<strong>on</strong>ewalling (blalba) but it was early morning when I watched and wrote…so please forgive me..please find hereafter my understanding of the situati<strong>on</strong> and my advice to Gianluca,What does Eagle Racing need?Given its track record and its recent achievement, Eagle Racing needs a new main sp<strong>on</strong>sor to further develop its business andpotentially, a few more in order to diversify its sources of funding and gain access to a portfolio of investors and sp<strong>on</strong>sors.Eagle Racing needs reliable and stable partners.Given that its main sp<strong>on</strong>sor has cancelled its participati<strong>on</strong>, Eagle begins to feel the pinch and could experience some shortageif it doesn’t manage to raise sufficient funding or credit facilities. However, <strong>on</strong>e should call for the facts and not get c<strong>on</strong>fusedwith feelings and short-termism.1) Sir Ralph Winfield and the Goodbridge companyIs a happy, enthusiast, passi<strong>on</strong>ate kind of pers<strong>on</strong>.Says he actually wants to sp<strong>on</strong>sor EagleSir Ralph takes time to see if he could go al<strong>on</strong>g with the people of eagle, all the small talk part is all about knowing eachother and sensing the possibility of l<strong>on</strong>g term partnership (values, spirit..)M<strong>on</strong>ey, terms or c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s are not discussed during the first meeting with Sir Ralph (he relies <strong>on</strong> Benjamin for the details).The deal could be signed of at 10MEUR/yearMaybe there’s a potential for more and maybe Winfield could introduce Eagle to other partners to joint the adventure.2) Walter Smith and Bauer IndustriesOne could say he hardly cares about racing.It is more a way for him to offer some kind of VIP-experience for his prospects or business partners.One could questi<strong>on</strong> its reliability and interest over timeThe deal is not sealed yet, but he utters a lot of demands and there’s little room for negotiati<strong>on</strong>, every word looks like a take itor leave it offer.Eagle could become in thrall to Bauer industries exclusive sp<strong>on</strong>sorshipHe makes a rather c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>al commitmentThe company is already involved in some mediatic turmoil that could reflect adversely <strong>on</strong> the company and its partners.What if allegati<strong>on</strong>s are c<strong>on</strong>firmed? Not every body would agree with selling goods in a breach of an UN resoluti<strong>on</strong>, exceptmaybe for some kind of Russian investors..3) Advice to GianlucaPolitely decline Walter Smith’s offer while being neutral.Explain that as l<strong>on</strong>g as the suspici<strong>on</strong>s aren’t waived, eagle couldn’t enter in a business relati<strong>on</strong>ship with him.Explain Eagle want to enter in a balanced partnership and that the terms and c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s he proposes are not in the vain of thepartnership Eagle seeks.Secure the deal with Goodbridge and expose the situati<strong>on</strong> to Sir Ralph Winfield to see if it could be possible to find othersp<strong>on</strong>sors.Imagine How to leverage the Goodbridge sp<strong>on</strong>sorship, etc..Kind regardsFredericAAA/<strong>INSEAD</strong>/062013 - 31