12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CAN THE BOLSHEVIKS RETAIN STATE POWER?117that by repudiating “workers’ control”, by repudiating the“dicta<strong>to</strong>rship <strong>of</strong> the proletariat” they are for the dicta<strong>to</strong>rship<strong>of</strong> the bourgeoisie. There is no middle course; a middle courseis the futile dream <strong>of</strong> the petty-bourgeois democrat.Not a single central body, not a single Bolshevik hasever argued against centralisation <strong>of</strong> the Soviets, againsttheir amalgamation. None <strong>of</strong> us objects <strong>to</strong> having fac<strong>to</strong>rycommittees in each branch <strong>of</strong> production, or <strong>to</strong> their centralisation.Bazarov is wide <strong>of</strong> the mark.We laugh, have laughed, and will laugh not at “centralism”,and not at “plans”, but at reformism, because, afterthe experience <strong>of</strong> the coalition, your reformism is utterlyridiculous. And <strong>to</strong> say “not replace the apparatus but reformit” means <strong>to</strong> be a reformist, means <strong>to</strong> become not a revolutionarybut a reformist democrat. Reformism means nothingmore than concessions on the part <strong>of</strong> the ruling class, butnot its overthrow; it makes concessions, but power remainsin its hands.This is precisely what has been tried during six months<strong>of</strong> the coalition.This is what we laugh at. Having failed <strong>to</strong> obtain a thoroughgrasp <strong>of</strong> the doctrine <strong>of</strong> the class struggle, Bazarovallows himself <strong>to</strong> be caught by the bourgeoisie who sing inchorus “Just so, just so, we are by no means opposed <strong>to</strong> reform,we are in favour <strong>of</strong> the workers participating in country-widecontrol, we fully agree with that”, and good Bazarovobjectively sings the descant for the capitalists.This has always been and always will be the case withpeople who in the thick <strong>of</strong> intense class struggle want <strong>to</strong>take up a “middle” position. And it is because-the writers<strong>of</strong> Novaya Zhizn are incapable <strong>of</strong> understanding the classstruggle that their policy is such a ridiculous and eternaloscillation between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat.Get busy on “plans”, dear citizens, that is not politics,that is not the class struggle; here you may be <strong>of</strong> use <strong>to</strong> thepeople. You have many economists on your paper. Unitewith those engineers and others who are willing <strong>to</strong> work onproblems <strong>of</strong> regulating production and distribution; devotethe centre page <strong>of</strong> your big “apparatus” (your paper) <strong>to</strong> apractical study <strong>of</strong> precise facts on the production and distribution<strong>of</strong> goods in Russia, on banks, syndicates, etc.,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!