12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CAN THE BOLSHEVIKS RETAIN STATE POWER?133Let us examine this experience without these charmingspectacles.You compare July 3-5 with “civil war”, because you believedAlexinsky, Pereverzev and Co. It is typical <strong>of</strong> thegentlemen <strong>of</strong> Novaya Zhizn that they believe such people(and do absolutely nothing themselves <strong>to</strong> collect informationabout July 3-5, although they have the huge apparatus <strong>of</strong> abig daily newspaper at their disposal).Let us assume for a moment, however, that July 3-5 wasnot the rudiment <strong>of</strong> civil war that was kept within therudimentary stage by the Bolsheviks, but actual civil war.Let us assume this.In that case, then, what does this lesson prove?First, the Bolsheviks did not take the <strong>of</strong>fensive, for itis indisputable that on the night <strong>of</strong> July 3-4, and even onJuly 4, they would have gained a great deal if they had takenthe <strong>of</strong>fensive. Their defensive position was their weakness,if we are <strong>to</strong> speak <strong>of</strong> civil war (as Novaya Zhizn does, andnot <strong>of</strong> converting a spontaneous outburst in<strong>to</strong> a demonstration<strong>of</strong> the type <strong>of</strong> April 20-21, as the facts show).The “lesson” therefore proves that the wise men <strong>of</strong> NovayaZhizn are wrong.Secondly, if the Bolsheviks did not even set out <strong>to</strong> startan insurrection on July 3 or 4, if not a single Bolshevik bodyeven raised such a question, the reason for it lies beyondthe scope <strong>of</strong> our controversy with Novaya Zhizn. For we arearguing about the lessons <strong>of</strong> “civil war”, i.e., <strong>of</strong> insurrection,and not about the point that obvious lack <strong>of</strong> a majority <strong>to</strong>support it restrains the revolutionary party from thinking<strong>of</strong> insurrection.Since everybody knows that the Bolsheviks received amajority in the metropolitan Soviets and in the country(over 49 per cent <strong>of</strong> the Moscow votes) much later than July1917, it again follows that the “lessons” are far, far fromwhat Novaya Zhizn, that lady with many good points, wouldlike them <strong>to</strong> be.No, no, you had better not meddle with politics, citizens<strong>of</strong> Novaya Zhizn!If the revolutionary party has no majority in the advancedcontingents <strong>of</strong> the revolutionary classes and in the country,insurrection is out <strong>of</strong> the question. Moreover, insurrection

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!