12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REVISION OF THE PARTY PROGRAMME157and the effect is that odds and ends <strong>of</strong> the definition <strong>of</strong>imperialism have been inserted, mostly inappropriately.Let us take the second section. Here Comrade Sokolnikovleft unchanged the beginning and the end; the beginningstates that the means <strong>of</strong> production are in the hands<strong>of</strong> a minority; the end, that the majority <strong>of</strong> the populationare proletarians or semi-proletarians. Right in the middle,Comrade Sokolnikov inserts a special phrase <strong>to</strong> the effect that“during the last quarter <strong>of</strong> a century the direct or indirectcontrol <strong>of</strong> production organised on capitalist lines haspassed in<strong>to</strong> the hands <strong>of</strong> all-powerful” banks, trusts, etc.This is mentioned earlier than the crowding out <strong>of</strong> thesmall by the big producers! The latter fact is first mentionedin the third section. But are not trusts the highest and latestmanifestation <strong>of</strong> the very process <strong>of</strong> the crowding out <strong>of</strong>small-scale by large-scale production? Is it appropriate <strong>to</strong>speak first <strong>of</strong> trusts, and then <strong>of</strong> the ousting <strong>of</strong> the smallproducer? Is it not a violation <strong>of</strong> logical sequence? Where,then, did the trusts come from? Is this not an error in theory?How and why has control “passed” in<strong>to</strong> their hands? All thiscannot be unders<strong>to</strong>od before the process <strong>of</strong> the ousting <strong>of</strong> thesmall producer is made clear.Let us take the third section that deals with the crowdingout <strong>of</strong> small by large enterprises. Here <strong>to</strong>o Comrade Sokolnikovretains the beginning (the increasing importance <strong>of</strong>big enterprises) and the end (small producers are being crowdedout). In the middle, however, he adds that big enterprises“have merged in<strong>to</strong> gigantic organisms which combinea series <strong>of</strong> consecutive steps <strong>of</strong> production and exchange”.But this insertion deals with an entirely different matter,namely, the concentration <strong>of</strong> the means <strong>of</strong> production andthe socialisation <strong>of</strong> labour by capitalism, the creation <strong>of</strong>the material conditions for the replacement <strong>of</strong> capitalismby socialism. In the old programme this point is not dealtwith until the seventh section.Comrade Sokolnikov adheres <strong>to</strong> the general plan <strong>of</strong> theold programme. He, <strong>to</strong>o, speaks <strong>of</strong> the material conditionsfor the replacement <strong>of</strong> capitalism by socialism only in theseventh section. He also retains in the seventh section a mention<strong>of</strong> the concentration <strong>of</strong> means <strong>of</strong> production and thesocialisation <strong>of</strong> labour!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!