12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

48V. I. LENINsitting and listening <strong>to</strong> the Zarudnys! And the Zarudnysare not the least sincere <strong>of</strong> them!The Bolsheviks should have walked out <strong>of</strong> the meetingin protest and not allowed themselves <strong>to</strong> be caught by theconference trap set <strong>to</strong> divert the people’s attention fromserious questions. The Bolsheviks should have left two orthree <strong>of</strong> their 136 delegates for “liaison work”, that is, <strong>to</strong>report by telephone the moment the idiotic babbling came<strong>to</strong> an end and the voting began. They should not have allowedthemselves <strong>to</strong> be kept busy with obvious nonsense for theobvious purpose <strong>of</strong> deceiving the people with the obviousaim <strong>of</strong> extinguishing the growing revolution by wastingtime on trivial matters.Ninety-nine per cent <strong>of</strong> the Bolshevik delegation ought<strong>to</strong> have gone <strong>to</strong> the fac<strong>to</strong>ries and barracks; that was theproper place for delegates who had come from all ends<strong>of</strong> Russia and who, after Zarudny’s speech, could see thefull depth <strong>of</strong> the Socialist-Revolutionary and Menshevikrottenness. There, closer <strong>to</strong> the masses, at hundreds andthousands <strong>of</strong> meetings and talks, they ought <strong>to</strong> have discussedthe lessons <strong>of</strong> this farcical conference whose obviouspurpose was only <strong>to</strong> give a respite <strong>to</strong> the KorniloviteKerensky and make it easier for him <strong>to</strong> try new variations<strong>of</strong> the “ministerial leapfrog” game.The Bolsheviks, it turned out, had a wrong attitude <strong>to</strong>parliamentarism in moments <strong>of</strong> revolutionary (and notconstitutional) crises, an incorrect attitude <strong>to</strong> the Socialist-Revolutionaries and Mensheviks.How it happened can be unders<strong>to</strong>od—his<strong>to</strong>ry made a verysharp turn at the time <strong>of</strong> the Kornilov revolt. The Partyfailed <strong>to</strong> keep pace with the incredibly fast tempo <strong>of</strong> his<strong>to</strong>ryat this turning-point. The Party allowed itself <strong>to</strong> bediverted, for the time being, in<strong>to</strong> the trap <strong>of</strong> a despicabletalking-shop.They should have left one hundredth <strong>of</strong> their forces forthat talking-shop and devoted ninety-nine hundredths<strong>to</strong> the masses.If the turn taken by his<strong>to</strong>ry called for a compromise withthe Socialist-Revolutionaries and Mensheviks (personallyI believe it did) the Bolsheviks should have proposed itclearly, openly and speedily, so that they could immediate-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!