12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32V. I. LENINletarian-revolutionary movement is represented by theBolshevik Party, and the bourgeois counter-revolutionarymovement by the Cadet Party, and this can hardly be disputedafter six months’ experience <strong>of</strong> the revolution. Threecomparisons <strong>of</strong> a factual nature can be made that concernthe question under consideration. A comparison <strong>of</strong> theMay elections <strong>to</strong> the local councils in Petrograd with theAugust elections <strong>to</strong> the city council shows a decrease inCadet votes and a tremendous increase in Bolshevik votes.The Cadet press admits that, as a rule, Bolshevism is strongwherever masses <strong>of</strong> workers or soldiers are concentrated.In the absence <strong>of</strong> any statistics concerning the fluctuation<strong>of</strong> the party membership, attendance at meetings,etc., the conscious support <strong>of</strong> the party by the masses maybe judged only from published data concerning cash collectionsfor the party. These data show a tremendous massscaleheroism on the part <strong>of</strong> worker Bolsheviks in collectingmoney for Pravda, 19 for the papers that have been suppressed,etc. The reports <strong>of</strong> such collections have alwaysbeen published. Among the Cadets we see nothing <strong>of</strong> thekind; their party work is obviously being “nourished” bycontributions from the rich. There is no trace <strong>of</strong> activeaid on the part <strong>of</strong> the masses.Lastly, a comparison <strong>of</strong> the movements <strong>of</strong> April 20-21and July 3-4 on the one hand, and the Kornilov revolt onthe other, shows that the Bolsheviks indicated point-blank<strong>to</strong> the masses who their enemy in the civil war is, namely,the bourgeoisie, the landowners and capitalists. The Kornilovrevolt has already demonstrated that the troops wh<strong>of</strong>ollowed Kornilov did so because they had been completelydeceived, a fact made obvious the moment the SavageDivision and Kornilov’s contingents came up againstthe Petrograd masses.Furthermore, what data indicate the strength <strong>of</strong> theproletariat and the bourgeoisie in the civil war? The Bolsheviksare strong only in the numbers and class-consciousness<strong>of</strong> the proletarians, in the sympathy with the Bolshevikslogans displayed by the Socialist-Revolutionary and Menshevik“rank and file” (i.e., workers and poor peasants).It is a fact that these slogans actually won over the majority

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!