12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

230V. I. LENINUnder the bill, no orchards, plantations, beet fields, etc.,can go in<strong>to</strong> the lease pool! Nor can the pool include landsrequired “<strong>to</strong> satisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> the owner, his family, employeesand workers, or <strong>to</strong> ensure the maintenance <strong>of</strong> availablelives<strong>to</strong>ck”!This means that the great landowner who has a sugarrefinery, a pota<strong>to</strong> processing plant, oil or other mill, orchardsand plantations, hundreds <strong>of</strong> head <strong>of</strong> cattle anddozens <strong>of</strong> employees and workers, is <strong>to</strong> retain a great estatefarmed on capitalist lines. The S.R. Party has indeed cheatedthe peasants with exceptional brazenness.Landed estates, or “privately held land”, as the billputs it, are <strong>to</strong> be transferred <strong>to</strong> the lease pool by land committeesset up under the law <strong>of</strong> April 21, 1917, by the government<strong>of</strong> landed proprie<strong>to</strong>rs headed by Prince Lvov and Co.,the selfsame government <strong>of</strong> Milyukov and Guchkov, theimperialists and plunderers <strong>of</strong> the masses, who were routedby the workers’ and soldiers’ movement in Petrograd onApril 20 and 21, i.e., a full six months ago.The land committee law issued by this government <strong>of</strong>landed proprie<strong>to</strong>rs is, <strong>of</strong> course, far from being a democratic(popular) law. On the contrary, it contains a whole series <strong>of</strong>outrageous departures from democracy. Take its Clause 11,which gives the “gubernia* land committees the right <strong>to</strong>suspend decisions <strong>of</strong> the volost and uyezd committees, pendinga final ruling by the central land committee”. Under thisswindling landowners’ law, the committees are so constitutedthat the uyezd committee is less democratic thanthe volost committee, the gubernia committee is less democraticthan the uyezd committee, and the central committeeis less democratic than the gubernia committee.The volost land committee is entirely elected by the population<strong>of</strong> the volost. Under the law, for instance, the uyezdcommittee must include the local magistrate and five members<strong>of</strong> “provisional executive committees” (pending the* Gubernia, uyezd, volost—Russian administrative terri<strong>to</strong>rial units.The largest <strong>of</strong> these was the gubernia, divided in<strong>to</strong> uyezds, which inturn were subdivided in<strong>to</strong> volosts. This system continued underSoviet power until the introduction <strong>of</strong> the new system <strong>of</strong> administrativeterri<strong>to</strong>rial divisions in 1929-30.—Ed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!