12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

474V. I. LENINthe time, who have been sleeping with an old, shabby littlebook carefully s<strong>to</strong>wed away under the pillow, the unwantedbook that serves them as a guide and manual in implanting<strong>of</strong>ficial socialism. But the minds <strong>of</strong> tens <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> thosewho are doing things create something infinitely l<strong>of</strong>tierthan the greatest genius can foresee. Genuine, revolutionarysocialism did not break away <strong>to</strong>day but at the beginning <strong>of</strong>the war. This significant break, this rift in socialist theory,has come about in every country and every state. And it issplendid that socialism has split!We can counter the accusation that we are fighting against“socialists” by saying merely that in the epoch <strong>of</strong> parliamentarismthese supporters <strong>of</strong> the latter no longer have anythingin common with socialism but have become decayed, obsoleteand backward, and have ended by deserting <strong>to</strong> the bourgeoisie.“Socialists” who shouted about “defending thecountry” during a war resulting from the imperialist urge <strong>of</strong>international robbers are not socialists but hangers-on <strong>of</strong>the bourgeoisie, their dish-lickers.Those who talk so much about the dicta<strong>to</strong>rship <strong>of</strong> democracymerely utter meaningless, absurd phrases which indicateneither economic knowledge nor political understanding.One <strong>of</strong> the objec<strong>to</strong>rs said here that the Paris Commune canbe proud <strong>of</strong> the fact that during the Paris workers’ uprisingthere was no violence or arbitrary action on their part; butit is beyond doubt that the Commune fell only because itdid not make proper use <strong>of</strong> armed force at the right moment,although it won undying fame in his<strong>to</strong>ry, for it was thefirst <strong>to</strong> put the idea <strong>of</strong> the dicta<strong>to</strong>rship <strong>of</strong> the proletariat in<strong>to</strong>practice.Commenting briefly on the struggle against the bourgeoisie,landowners and capitalists, the speaker declared firmlyand resolutely, amidst a burst <strong>of</strong> applause: “Say what youmay, the bourgeoisie will in the end be forced by the will<strong>of</strong> the revolutionary people either <strong>to</strong> capitulate, or <strong>to</strong>perish.”Drawing a parallel between anarchism and Bolshevikviews, Comrade <strong>Lenin</strong> said that at that time, in the period<strong>of</strong> a radical break-up <strong>of</strong> the bourgeois system, the concept<strong>of</strong> anarchism was finally assuming concrete features. But

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!