12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

224V. I. LENINwrote, himself underlining the word before four times. Isit really so difficult <strong>to</strong> understand that before a decision hasbeen taken on a strike by the centre, it is permissible <strong>to</strong>agitate for and against it; but that after a decision in favour<strong>of</strong> a strike (with the additional decision <strong>to</strong> conceal thisfrom the enemy), <strong>to</strong> carry on agitation against the strikeis strike-breaking? Any worker will understand that. Thequestion <strong>of</strong> insurrection has been discussed in the centresince September. That is when Zinoviev and Kamenev couldand should have come out in writing, so that everybody, uponseeing their arguments, would have realised that they hadcompletely lost their heads. To conceal one’s views fromthe Party for a whole month before a decision is taken, and<strong>to</strong> send out a dissenting opinion after a decision is taken—that is strike-breaking.Zinoviev pretends not <strong>to</strong> understand this difference, hepretends not <strong>to</strong> understand that after a decision <strong>to</strong> strikehas been taken by the centre, only blacklegs can carry onagitation among the lower bodies against that decision.Any worker will understand that.And Zinoviev did agitate and attempted <strong>to</strong> defeat thecentre’s decision, both at Sunday’s meeting, 93 where he andKamenev secured not a single vote, and in his present letter.For Zinoviev has the effrontery <strong>to</strong> assert that “the opinion<strong>of</strong> the Party has not been canvassed” and that such questions“cannot be decided by ten men”. Just think! Every member<strong>of</strong> the Central Committee knows that more than ten C.C.members were present at the decisive meeting, that a majority<strong>of</strong> the plenary meeting were present, that Kamenev himselfdeclared at the meeting that “this meeting is decisive”,that it was known with absolute certainty that the majority<strong>of</strong> the absent members <strong>of</strong> the Central Committee were not inagreement with Zinoviev and Kamenev. And now, after theCentral Committee has adopted a decision at a meetingwhich Kamenev himself admitted <strong>to</strong> be decisive, a member<strong>of</strong> the Central Committee has the audacity <strong>to</strong> write that “theopinion <strong>of</strong> the Party has not been canvassed”, and that suchquestions “cannot be decided by ten men”. That is strike-breakingin the full sense <strong>of</strong> the term. Between Party congresses,the Central Committee decides. The Central Committee hasdecided. Kamenev and Zinoviev, who did not come out in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!