12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THESES ON THE QUESTION OF A SEPARATE PEACE445He betrays socialism who calls the war with Germanimperialism a defensive and just war, but actually receivessupport from the Anglo-French imperialists, and concealssecret treaties concluded with them from the people. Hedoes not in the least betray socialism who, without concealinganything from the people, and without concluding anysecret treaties with the imperialists, agrees <strong>to</strong> sign terms <strong>of</strong>peace which are unfavourable <strong>to</strong> the weak nation and favourable<strong>to</strong> the imperialists <strong>of</strong> one group, if at that momentthere is no strength <strong>to</strong> continue the war.10. Another argument in favour <strong>of</strong> immediate war isthat, by concluding peace, we objectively become agents <strong>of</strong>German imperialism, for we afford it the opportunity <strong>to</strong>release troops from our front, we surrender <strong>to</strong> it millions<strong>of</strong> prisoners <strong>of</strong> war, and so on. But this argument <strong>to</strong>o ismanifestly incorrect, for a revolutionary war at the presentjuncture would, objectively speaking, make us agents <strong>of</strong>Anglo-French imperialism, by providing it with forces whichwould promote its aims. The British bluntly <strong>of</strong>fered ourCommander-in-Chief, Krylenko, one hundred rubles permonth for every one <strong>of</strong> our soldiers provided we continuedthe war. Even if we did not take a single kopek from theAnglo-French, we nevertheless would be helping them,objectively speaking, by diverting part <strong>of</strong> the Germanarmy.<strong>From</strong> that point <strong>of</strong> view, in neither case would we beentirely escaping some sort <strong>of</strong> imperialist bond, and it isobvious that it is impossible <strong>to</strong> escape it completely withou<strong>to</strong>verthrowing world imperialism. The correct conclusionfrom this is that the moment a socialist government triumphedin any one country, questions must be decided, notfrom the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> whether this or that imperialismis preferable, but exclusively from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> theconditions which best make for the development and consolidation<strong>of</strong> the socialist revolution which has already begun.In other words, the underlying principle <strong>of</strong> our tacticsmust not be, which <strong>of</strong> the two imperialisms it is more pr<strong>of</strong>itable<strong>to</strong> aid at this juncture, but rather, how the socialistrevolution can be most firmly and reliably ensured thepossibility <strong>of</strong> consolidating itself, or, at least, <strong>of</strong> maintainingitself in one country until it is joined by other countries.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!