12.07.2015 Views

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

Collected Works of V. I. Lenin - Vol. 26 - From Marx to Mao

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

54V. I. LENINis impossible for them <strong>to</strong> “carry” the bourgeoisie with them.Moreover, the upper strata <strong>of</strong> the petty bourgeoisie and themore well-<strong>to</strong>-do strata <strong>of</strong> the democratic petty bourgeoisieare patently against a new revolution. This fact is soobvious that there is no need <strong>to</strong> dwell on it here. TheLieberdans, Tseretelis and Chernovs illustrate this mostclearly.The class relations have changed. This is the crux <strong>of</strong> thematter.Different classes now stand “on the one and the otherside <strong>of</strong> the barricade”.That is the main thing.That, and that alone, is the scientific reason for speaking<strong>of</strong> a new revolution which—arguing purely theoretically,taking the question in the abstract—could be accomplishedlegally if, for instance, the Constituent Assembly, convokedby the bourgeoisie, produced a majority opposed <strong>to</strong> thebourgeoisie, if the majority belonged <strong>to</strong> the parties <strong>of</strong> theworkers and poor peasants.The objective relations <strong>of</strong> the classes, their role (economicand political) outside and inside representativeinstitutions <strong>of</strong> the given type; the rise or decline <strong>of</strong> therevolution; the relation <strong>of</strong> extra-parliamentary <strong>to</strong> parliamentarymeans <strong>of</strong> struggle—these are the chief, the basicobjective facts which must be considered if the tactics<strong>of</strong> boycott or participation are <strong>to</strong> be deduced in a<strong>Marx</strong>ist way and not arbitrarily, according <strong>to</strong> our “sympathies”.The experience <strong>of</strong> our revolution clearly demonstrateshow <strong>to</strong> approach the boycott question in a <strong>Marx</strong>ist way.Why did the boycott <strong>of</strong> the Bulygin Duma 33 prove correcttactics?Because it was in accordance with the objective alignment<strong>of</strong> social forces in their development. It providedthe maturing revolution with a slogan for the overthrow <strong>of</strong>an old order which, <strong>to</strong> distract the people from the revolution,was convoking a clumsily fabricated compromise institution(the Bulygin Duma) which did not show promise <strong>of</strong> anyearnest “anchoring” in parliamentarism. The extra-parliamentarymeans <strong>of</strong> struggle <strong>of</strong> the proletariat and the peasantrywere stronger. These are the elements that went

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!