evaluation of the european strategy on safety and health at work ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN STRATEGY ON SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK 2007-201221117.1 On a scale from 1-5 (where 1 is not successful, 3 is somewhat successfuland 5 is highly successful), how would you rate <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> success <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> national <strong>strategy</strong> in facilitating better practises at local level?18 In your view, has <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> national <strong>strategy</strong> helped to ensureincreased compliance with EU legislation (as transposed into nationallegislation) in your country?18.1 On a scale from 1-5 (where 1 is not successful, 3 is somewhat successfuland 5 is highly successful), how would you rate <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> success <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> national <strong>strategy</strong> in facilitating increased compliance withlegislation?19 Has <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> national <strong>strategy</strong> had an effect in terms <strong>of</strong>promoting a preventive culture in your country?19.1 On a scale from 1-5 (where 1 is not successful, 3 is somewhat successfuland 5 is highly successful), how would you rate <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> success <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> national <strong>strategy</strong> in promoting a preventive culture?20 Has <strong>the</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> national <strong>strategy</strong> had an effect in terms <strong>of</strong> moreand better knowledge on risks and <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> this in policy development / forrisk prevention in your country?20.1 On a scale from 1-5 (where 1 is not successful, 3 is somewhat successfuland 5 is highly successful), how would you rate <strong>the</strong> degree <strong>of</strong> success <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> national <strong>strategy</strong> in facilitating more and better knowledge on risks?Monitoring and <strong>evaluation</strong> <strong>of</strong> national <strong>strategy</strong>21 If <strong>the</strong> national <strong>strategy</strong> prescribes monitoring and/or <strong>evaluation</strong>, refer to thisand ask <strong>the</strong> questions below. If it does not, ask whe<strong>the</strong>r monitoring and/or<strong>evaluation</strong> is being carried out, and - if yes, ask <strong>the</strong> questions below - except<strong>the</strong> first one:21.1 Is this monitoring and/or <strong>evaluation</strong> implemented as intended?21.2 If monitoring and/or <strong>evaluation</strong> reports have been made, is it possible tohave copies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se?21.3 Do you consider monitoring and/or <strong>evaluation</strong> to be sufficient?21.4 Have <strong>the</strong> results from monitoring and/or <strong>evaluation</strong> led to any changes inyour national <strong>strategy</strong>?21.5 What has worked particularly well in your country? Are <strong>the</strong>re any bestpractises in respect to monitoring and/or <strong>evaluation</strong> which could berelevant to o<strong>the</strong>r MS? If, yes describe brieflyhttp://projects.cowiportal.com/ps/A019055/Documents/3 Project documents/Interim and final report/Final report October 2012/OSH <strong>evaluation</strong>-report_Final_submitted 14 March2013.docx
212 EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN STRATEGY ON SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORKAppendix D Standard interview guide for EUlevel stakeholdersIntroduction to <strong>evaluation</strong>, interviewer. Information about interviewee, etc.I. Development <strong>of</strong> EU Strategy1. To what extent have you participated in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current EUStrategy on Health and Safety at work?1.1 What was <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> your organisation in <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EUStrategy?1.2 Did you take part in <strong>the</strong> public consultation on <strong>the</strong> Strategy?2. Was your participation sufficient or should your organisation have been moreinvolved?2.1 If so, in which part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process should your organisation have beenmore involved?2.2 What were <strong>the</strong> barriers to a greater involvement <strong>of</strong> your organisation?3. Were your views correctly reflected in <strong>the</strong> final <strong>strategy</strong>?3.1 If not, what particular issues were left out from your proposals?3.2 Why do you think such issues were left out?II.Objectives <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU Strategy4. Do you agree with <strong>the</strong> overall objectives/target (25% reduction in workrelatedaccidents and illnesses) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU OSH <strong>strategy</strong>?4.1 In particular, are all six priorities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EU Strategy relevant?› 1. Improvement/simplification <strong>of</strong> legislation› 2. Development <strong>of</strong> national strategies› 3. Promotion <strong>of</strong> preventive culture› 4. Better identification and assessment <strong>of</strong> new risks› 5. Development <strong>of</strong> monitoring tools to track progress in relation to OSHstrategies› 6. Fur<strong>the</strong>r development <strong>of</strong> international cooperation on OSH4.2 Which one is most relevant and which is less relevant (rank <strong>the</strong> prioritiesby relevance)?5. Is <strong>the</strong>re any issue that should have been included in <strong>the</strong> EU OSH Strategy asone <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> main priorities and has not?http://projects.cowiportal.com/ps/A019055/Documents/3 Project documents/Interim and final report/Final reportOctober 2012/OSH <strong>evaluation</strong>-report_Final_submitted 14 March 2013.docx
Page 1 and 2:
MARCH 2013DG EMPLOYMENT, SOCIAL AFF
Page 3 and 4:
EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN STRATEGY
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
10 EVALUATION OF THE EUREVALUATION
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167: EVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN STRATEGY
Page 206 and 207: 2/8 Lige titelNo Question Answer Co
Page 208 and 209: 4/8 Lige titel23. Does the<
show all

evaluation of the european strategy on safety and health at work ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?