evaluation of the european strategy on safety and health at work ...
evaluation of the european strategy on safety and health at work ...
evaluation of the european strategy on safety and health at work ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
38 EVALUATION OF THE EUREVALUATION OF THE EUROPEAN STRATEGY ON SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK 2007-201238Table 4-3The 3-year trend (2009-2011) in r<strong>at</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> occup<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>al accidents <strong>and</strong> <strong>work</strong>rel<strong>at</strong>ed<strong>health</strong> problems <strong>and</strong> illnesses.Member St<strong>at</strong>eR<strong>at</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> occup<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>alaccidentsR<strong>at</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>work</strong>-rel<strong>at</strong>edMSDR<strong>at</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>work</strong>-rel<strong>at</strong>edstressAustria Belgium ? Bulgaria n/aCyprus ? ?Czech Republic Denmark … Est<strong>on</strong>ia ? ?Finl<strong>and</strong> France ?Germany … Greece - - -Hungary - - -Irel<strong>and</strong> ? ?Italy ? ?L<strong>at</strong>via … …Lithuania - - -Luxembourg Malta Ne<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rl<strong>and</strong>s Pol<strong>and</strong> - - -Portugal - - -Romania … ?Slovak Republic - - -Slovenia ? ?Spain ?Sweden - - -United Kingdom … Summary Increasing 4 4 5 Decreasing 12 5 1 Stable 1 3 4… No sign. trend 3 2 1? No info. avail 0 6 8- No answer 7 7 7n/a 0 0 1Symbols: Increasing, Decreasing, Stable, … No significant trend, ? No inform<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>available, - No answer given, n/a Not applicable. Source: Scoreboard 2009.According to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> new d<strong>at</strong>a presented in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> table above, in 12 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Member St<strong>at</strong>es<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> three-year trend, in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> r<strong>at</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> occup<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong>al accidents, is downward, in <strong>on</strong>e it isunchanged, while in three Member St<strong>at</strong>es <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> vari<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong> is not significant. In <strong>on</strong>lyfour cases is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> trend reported to be upward. Even though d<strong>at</strong>a is missing fromhttp://projects.cowiportal.com/ps/A019055/Documents/3 Project documents/Interim <strong>and</strong> final report/Final report October 2012/OSH <str<strong>on</strong>g>evalu<strong>at</strong>i<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>report_Final_submitted14 March 2013.docx
Change language