THESIS - ROC CH ... - FINAL - resubmission.pdf - University of Guelph

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Gennadios A, Brandenburg AH, Weller CL, Testin RF (1993) Effect of pH on properties of wheat gluten and soy protein isolate films. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 41:1835– 1839. doi: 10.1021/jf00035a006 Di Gioia L, Guilbert S (1999) Corn protein-based thermoplastic resins: effect of some polar and amphiphilic plasticizers. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 47:1254–61. Goormaghtigh E, Cabiaux V, Ruysschaert JM (1994) Determination of soluble and membrane protein structure by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. III. Secondary structures. Subcellular Biochemistry 23:405–450. Guerrero P, de la Caba K (2010) Thermal and mechanical properties of soy protein films processed at different pH by compression. Journal of Food Engineering 100:261–269. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.04.008 Habibi Y, Lucia L a, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chemical reviews 110:3479–500. doi: 10.1021/cr900339w Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund L a. A, Lindström T, Lindstrom T, Lindstro T (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. European Polymer Journal 43:3434–3441. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.038 Hernandez-Izquierdo VM, Krochta JM (2008) Thermoplastic processing of proteins for film formation--a review. Journal of food science 73:R30–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1750- 3841.2007.00636.x Hernandez-Izquierdo VM, Reid DS, McHugh TH, Berrios JDJ, Krochta JM (2008) Thermal transitions and extrusion of glycerol-plasticized whey protein mixtures. Journal of food science 73:E169–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00735.x Hubbe M, Rojas O, Lucia L (2008) Cellulosic nanocomposites: a review. BioResources 3:929– 980. Hussain F, Hojjati M, Okamoto M, Gorga RE (2006) Review article: polymer-matrix nanocomposites, processing, manufacturing, and application: an overview. Journal of composite materials 40:1151–1575. doi: 10.1177/0021998306067321 Janardhnan S, Sain M (2011) Isolation of Cellulose Nanofibers: Effect of Biotreatment on Hydrogen Bonding Network in Wood Fibers. International Journal of Polymer Science 2011:6. doi: 10.1155/2011/279610 Janardhnan S, Sain MM (2006) Isolation of cellulose microfibrils-An enzymatic approach. BioResources 1:176–188. Jonoobi M, Harun J, Shakeri A, Misra M, Oksman K (2009) Chemical composition, crystallinity, and thermal degradation of bleached and unbleached kenaf bast (Hibiscus cannabinus) pulp and nanofibers. Bioresources 4:626–639. 114
Kacurakova M, Capek P, Sasinkova V, Wellner N, Ebringerova A (2000) FT-IR study of plant cell wall model compounds: pectic polysaccharides and hemicelluloses. Carbohydrate 43:195–203. Kalia S, Dufresne A, Cherian BM, Kaith BS, Avérous L, Njuguna J, Nassiopoulos E (2011) Cellulose-Based Bio- and Nanocomposites: A Review. International Journal of Polymer Science 2011:1–35. doi: 10.1155/2011/837875 Karnnet S, Potiyaraj P, Pimpan V (2005) Preparation and properties of biodegradable stearic acid-modified gelatin films. Polymer Degradation and Stability 90:106–110. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.02.016 Kibblewhite R (1972) Effect of beating on fiber morphology and fiber surface structure. Kokoszka S, Debeaufort F, Hambleton A, Lenart A, Voilley A (2010) Protein and glycerol contents affect physico-chemical properties of soy protein isolate-based edible films. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies 11:503–510. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2010.01.006 Li Y, Jiang Y, Liu F, Ren F, Leng X (2010) Fabrication and characterization of TiO2/whey protein isolate nanocomposite film. Food Hydrocolloids 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.10.006 Liu L, Kerry JPJF (2006) Effect of food ingredients and selected lipids on the physical properties of extruded edible films/casings. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 41:295–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.01063.x Lodha P, Netravali AN (2005) Thermal and mechanical properties of environment-friendly ―green‖ plastics from stearic acid modified-soy protein isolate. Industrial Crops and Products 21:49–64. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2003.12.006 Long TC, Saleh N, Tilton RD, Lowry GV, Veronesi B (2006) Titanium Dioxide ( P25 ) Produces Reactive Oxygen Species in Implications for Nanoparticle. Environmental Science and Technology 40:4346–4350. Luo L, Wang X, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Chang PR, Wang YAN, Chen YUN (2008) Physical properties and biocompatibility of cellulose / soy protein isolate membranes coagulated from acetic aqueous solution. Polymer 19:479–496. López-Rubio a., Lagaron JM, Ankerfors M, Lindström T, Nordqvist D, Mattozzi a., Hedenqvist MS (2007) Enhanced film forming and film properties of amylopectin using micro-fibrillated cellulose. Carbohydrate Polymers 68:718–727. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.08.008 Marques P a. a. P, Trindade T, Neto CP (2006) Titanium dioxide/cellulose nanocomposites prepared by a controlled hydrolysis method. Composites Science and Technology 66:1038–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.029 Miller K, Krochta J (1997) Oxygen and aroma barrier properties of edible films: A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology 8:228–237. 115
Page 1 and 2:
A Study on the Extrusion of Soy Pro
Page 3 and 4:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My research would
Page 5 and 6:
4.3.9 Statistical Analysis.........
Page 7 and 8:
LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: Compariso
Page 9 and 10:
Figure 5.2: Light optical microscop
Page 11 and 12:
1.0 INTRODUCTION The production of
Page 13 and 14:
einforcement material. Research int
Page 15 and 16:
via centrifugation into four fracti
Page 17 and 18:
zones are synonymous to feeding, tr
Page 19 and 20:
Ralston (2008) investigated the ext
Page 21 and 22:
onding between hydroxyl groups and
Page 23 and 24:
Table 2.2: Summary of cellulose par
Page 25 and 26:
through the use of enzymes have pro
Page 27 and 28:
matrix such as soy protein (Wang et
Page 29 and 30:
4) Explore the extraction process f
Page 31 and 32:
4.3 METHODS 4.3.1 SAMPLE PREPARATIO
Page 33 and 34:
a Figure 4.2: a) Schematic of extru
Page 35 and 36:
length at break by the initial grip
Page 37 and 38:
4.4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 4.4.1 SP
Page 39 and 40:
Further experiments were carried ou
Page 41 and 42:
Figure 4.5: Film with rough texture
Page 43 and 44:
extrusion screw to continuously bre
Page 45 and 46:
stopped which fixes the spherical s
Page 47 and 48:
4.4.3 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES Mechani
Page 49 and 50:
Elongation at break (%) Figure 4.10
Page 51 and 52:
Table 4.5: Water vapor permeability
Page 53 and 54:
4.4.5 FTIR ANALYSIS The main absorb
Page 55 and 56:
4.4.6 CONCLUSION The extrusion of S
Page 57 and 58:
5.3 METHODS 5.3.1 CELLULOSE EXTRACT
Page 59 and 60:
For mechanical treatments, the obta
Page 61 and 62:
initial soy biomass; SNF and SMF. T
Page 63 and 64:
compiled by Moon et al. (2011), thi
Page 65 and 66:
RSH: 5min HPH: 20 passes, 4000 - 60
Page 67 and 68:
SMF micrographs, the presence of fi
Page 69 and 70:
process as described. However, it m
Page 71 and 72:
a peak at 22.6° is representative
Page 73 and 74: chemical and mechanical treatment h
Page 75 and 76: 6.3 METHODS 6.3.1 SAMPLE PREPARATIO
Page 77 and 78: 6.3.3 FILM CONDITIONING Similar to
Page 79 and 80: increased in size. At fiber concent
Page 81 and 82: 6.4.2 MORPHOLOGY AND STRUCTURE Due
Page 83 and 84: SEM images of the cryo-fractured su
Page 85 and 86: Table 6.1: Mechanical properties of
Page 87 and 88: cellulose and SPI. This high interf
Page 89 and 90: concentrations at isolated sites. A
Page 91 and 92: Similar to Section 4.4.5, dominatin
Page 93 and 94: Further analysis of the Amide II ba
Page 95 and 96: specimens that have been cryo-crush
Page 97 and 98: crushing. Conversely, this could al
Page 99 and 100: 7.0 EXPLORATORY WORK WITH TIO 2 NAN
Page 101 and 102: 7.3.2 COMPOUNDING AND EXTRUSION Com
Page 103 and 104: smaller size of P90, the ability to
Page 105 and 106: Table 7.1: Mechanical Strength of T
Page 107 and 108: Modulus of Elasticity (MPa) 120 110
Page 109 and 110: (21 nm) particle was seen to have a
Page 111 and 112: 7.4.3 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF TIO2
Page 113 and 114: Tensile Strenght (MPa) 12 11 10 9 8
Page 115 and 116: Modulus of Elasticity (MPa) 200 180
Page 117 and 118: 8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 119 and 120: The viability of introducing a comp
Page 121 and 122: acting as a coupling agent for furt
Page 123: Cherian BM, Leao AL, Souza SFD, Tho
Page 127 and 128: Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H
Page 129: Wang N, Ding E, Cheng R (2008) Prep
show all

THESIS - ROC CH ... - FINAL - resubmission.pdf - University of Guelph

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?